This essay will reason that in a more contested Asia-Pacific strategic environment, Australia will not need to develop a more independent strategic and defence policy, but should reduce reliance on its United States’ ally. The Asia-Pacific region is continuously undergoing great economic growth and development and many countries are enjoying the benefits derived from it, including Australia. On the other hand, the world is seeing a rise of military and economic powerhouses in the region, most notably China. This topic is critical for academics and policy makers to understand the implications of the contested environment and how to deal effectively with all the consequences that could undermine the region’s prosperity, peace, and stability. …show more content…
It is important to take into account that no country’s defence is totally self-sufficient (McLennan 2002). Australia will be unable to have an absolute independent defence policy, due to the multifaceted and reliant nature of modern society. States can only sustain some control and ‘relative independence’ through channels such as collective action. By looking at Australia’s defence paper in history it shows that since the end of the Vietnam War, Australia has created a defence policy with the foreground on self-reliance, the capability to protect Australia without allied fighting arms. The concept of self-reliance emerged from worries when the United States did not come to support the conflict with Indonesia (Fruhling 2014). The 1967 Australian Defence White Paper was the first paper that focused on the concept of self-reliance as main policy idea (Fruhling 2014). The core concept of self-reliance entailed Australia to pursue a defence force that was capable of independent action to achieve broader foreign policy objectives. However, the notion of ‘self-reliance’ was changed when the 2013 White Paper was released. It underlined the importance of self-reliance within the context of our Alliance with the United States and our cooperation with other countries in the region to deal with the challenges emerging from the Indo-Pacific (Fruhling 2014). The notion of ‘self-reliance’ was reinterpreted in a way that mismatched with the prior notion of self-reliance. The change in language shows that there are many factors that show that there are little reasons for Australia to create self-reliant operations in the defence of Australia. These reasons are, but not inclusive, Indonesia is no longer a threat, Australia’s isolated location allows it to be distant from the main foci of tension and possible future conflict, no states will be able to
Although Australia’s relationship with the British was weakened as the result of actions during WW2 our relationship with the USA was the reciprocal; this period resulted in a strengthening of ties with the Americans. A few key events were pivotal in this change. The first of these was when General Douglas MacArthur took over the defence of Australia and the Pacific Campaign in March 1942, discarding the current battle plan of holding ‘The Brisbane Line’. Instead in his quote “...so I instantly changed the conception (The Brisbane Line) with the basic thought that the ‘battle of Australia’ would be settled in the little islands to the north, north-east and north-west. I would make my fight there - win, lose or draw” explains that the battles, in which the fate of Australia would be decided, were to occur in the Philippines.
Australia’s response to the threat of communism after WW2 was extraordinary. Australia and its politicians immediately recognised what could happen of a result of the domino theory. With the Soviet Union influencing so many countries and causing China, Vietnam, and North Korea to turn Communist it was only matter of time until it reached Australia, and all in all this was when Australia took action.
In the twentieth century after World War 2 the world was threatened by the takeover of communist that had begun to consume the globe. The Australian government identified that the fear ideology communism will take over the country if no actions were taken to stand against and stop it. The Australian government provided support and participated in several military conflicts during the Cold War to reduce the threat of communist around the world. However, the longest of Australia’s military engagement was the Vietnam War from 1965 to 1975. Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War was mainly centred on its fear of the ‘Domino Theory’, and its relations with the U.S through the Foreign policy which involved the ‘Forward Defence’ policy. The
Essay: Federation of Australia By Tristan Scheirs Defence A very important reason why Australia decided to become a nation (having a federal government) was because of an inadequate defence force. Each of the six colonies in Australia had their own military force. But when it came to patrolling the extensive Australian coastline, they had to rely on the British navy to fulfil that task. Due to there being a number of countries such as Germany, France, and Russia who had colonised parts of the Pacific, there was a growing fear that one of them could have attacked Australia. There was a report released by British Major - General Sir J Bevan Edwards in 1889, states the individual colonies of Australia did not have enough soldiers,
In this essay, it will be seen that the expansion of the external affairs power since Federation reflects Australia’s growing independence from a Dominion of the United Kingdom and its transition into nationhood.
Though Australia is a powerful country and is considered a main player in the surrounding area yet it is does not hold a primary rank in the global environment. Australia's contribution in military interventions beyond the Asia Pacific is smaller and follows the lead of another country such as the United States. The Australian Defense Force (ADF) has the capability to tackle with the crises in its neighborhood, because of emergence of security concerns constantly from Indonesia and many other smaller states. Australia has adopted a strategy to support and strengthen the presence of United States in the region. This mutual cooperation is very important for Australia as regards economy and security. Its alliance with United States has been due to many reasons.
Australians, was a domestic organization. While the party was actively aggressive towards governmental policies, they did not have the capacity to be at war with the Commonwealth. This provision bore no relation to
As we have seen there was a genuine fear of communism in Asia spreading to Australia which was known as the ‘Domino Theory’ and as it can be stated that one of the main reasons Australia got involved in the Vietnam War was the ‘Foreign policy’ and ‘SEATO’. Furthermore Australia’s strategy against a possible threat to Australia’s security from Asia was called ‘forward defence’. The idea was to meet any possible threat before it came too close to Australian shores. ‘Forward defence’ meant that Australia would willingly commit troops to conflicts well beyond its shores to counter potential threats. This strategy was behind the decisions made by the Menzies government to contribute forces to conflicts in Asia, where it was thought that communists were attempting to take power. Australian troops were sent to the Korean War (1950-1953) in support of both Britain and the USA as part of a UN force, The Malaya Emergency
In 1901, Australia’s Federation was concerned about the number of Chinese who made their way to Australia during the gold rushes, and ‘white’ Australia’s fear of being swamped by Asia. After the second World War, this perspective was a key element of Australia’s foreign policy. This fear of Asia was amplified once communism had grown to Asia and especially after 1949 when China had become a communist nation.
A better way of protecting Australia was to have a better "defensive" country. Prior to federation the colonies struggled to defend themselves without the equipment needed. Each colony had its own military, however they relied on British forces to assist them with patrolling the vast Australian coastline. Different Australian colonies were highly afraid of different nations such as Germany, France and Russia. The colonies were also afraid of Asian countries, as they were very close to Australia. These countries were mostly China and Japan, who had big military backgrounds.
This essay analyses the Australian-China bilateral relationship since 1945 and in particular its political significance to Australia. Many global factors have influenced this relationship, including the advent of the Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the collapse of the Soviet bloc European nations. In addition, internal political changes in Australia and China have both affected and been affected by the global changes. It will be analysed that Australia’s bilateral relationship with China has always had a sharp political edge but that approaching the new millenium economics and trade considerations are shaping Australias and for that matter Chinese politics.
The U.S. and Australian alliance share an interest in maintaining the peace and stability in the Asian- Pacific
The United States (US) is constantly looking for ways to improve relations with other countries and to follow their National Security Strategy (NSS). To aid the US in analyzing different countries, the PMESII-PT is used as a formula to keep everyone on the same page. The PMESII-PT contains eight different variables which help the United States analyze how different countries can affect their National Security Strategy. These variables include: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical terrain, and time. These variables can be used to help better understand the situation and most important aspects of any country. Japan is a major country that can have a large impact on US relations and build on the current NSS. Throughout this paper, the PMESII-PT variables are examined to help educate and show how Japan can affect the United States’ NSS. After reading this paper, one can gain knowledge on how Japan can have a large influence on US interests in the Pacific/ Asian Command (PACOM) region.
Providing aid to developing countries in the Asia-Pacific region allows the countries to develop politically and economically, helping the region prosper, and therefore improve Australia’s personal security. The aid provided by Australia helps developing countries to stabilise their situation
The development in the progress of China, India and Indonesia benefits Australia and contributes significantly to regional stability which extends opportunities for a successful and reciprocating business partnership instead of being aid dependent. Australia’s economical national interest is directly linked to the success, stability and peaceful interactions of its neighbours because these countries are also the first line of defence against many negative issues which could affect Australia (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2016c). If these states remain to be wealthy and stable, they will respond better to efficiently to threats and complications in trade. In order to benefit from the trading relationships with the neighbouring countries, Australia needs to take advantage of the international economic opportunities and ensure we are focused on advancing in global economic, financial, investment and trade institutions. A globally integrated economy is crucial due to the growth which can be gained from an open trading system and foreign direct investment which secures our position in the economically advancing countries of the world and our own financial welfare (Wong 2017).