Argumentative Essay: Australia's Buyback Program

School shootings in the United States have ignited national debate about how to decrease gun violence. These controversial debates have focused entirely on issues associated to gun control. Both adversaries and supporters of gun control have used their personal views and utilized media attention in order to advance their claims. Anti-gun activists suggest the implementation of the Australian style gun control system could be a favorable policy in the United States. Contrary to anti-gun ideology, pro-gun opponents dispute that the Second Amendment protects citizens with their right to bear arms. Creating an Australian style gun control system will not be successful because removing guns from citizens

Gun Control has been a hotly debated issue for many years. In modern American politics gun control is debated between the left, who seeks to increase gun control laws, and the right, who seek to protect gun ownership. Gun Control should not be enacted because Gun Control Laws have been proven ineffective, The Second Amendment allows American Citizens the right to keep and bear arms, and Gun Control laws take power from American Citizens.

Many people think that gun control laws pushed by the Democratic Party will help reduce the amount of guns bought, this a very big misconception. The gun laws that are in effect now require a background check and age requirement, but according to Junior Scholastic there are,”major holes in it. Perhaps the biggest is that many small-scale sellers, who claim to be "hobbyists," aren't required to conduct background checks” this example shows that nearly anyone can buy a gun and do not have to have a background check. Another reason why gun control does not work is that,”A criminal could also resort to a method other than a firearm”(NRA). Before this great country was created men used swords, axes, daggers, bows and many other types of weapons to inflict terror, murder, and other horrid acts. The guns and other weapons are not what kill

From January 1, 2015 to December 23 of that same year a total of 12,942 people had been killed in America due to gun violence. These numbers include murders, accidental shootings, and murder suicides. According to a nonprofit website that records gun deaths in America called “Gun Violence Archive”, there were more than 50,000 gun violence incidents in 2015 alone. This includes homicides, gang incidents, and accidental and self-defense shootings, but it does not, however, include the near 20,000 American deaths due to gun suicides that occur each year.

Control is bad. The more control there is the less freedom we have. There are a lot of people that may say that gun control works, the simple fact is that those people do not know the difference between an assault weapon and an assault rifle. A assault weapon is a term used to describe a weapon that shoots one bullet per pull of the trigger, a assault rifle is a rapid fire, automatic weapon designed for the military use and sometimes confused for an assault weapon. Why would we listen to someone who does not have any knowledge about anything on the topic that they are trying to argue.

According to the Violence Policy Center, there were only 211 justifiable firearm homicides in the U.S. during 2013. In that same year, there were 7838 criminal gun homicides. That means that for every justifiable gun homicide, there were roughly 37 criminal homicides committed with a firearm. Even having a gun can make a situation more fatal. An American Journal of Public Health study found that a person with a gun on them during an altercation with a firearm was 4.46 times more likely to get shot than those who did not. Guns ultimately do more harm than good in most

There is no reason why so many people, living in what is supposed to be a peaceful society, possess guns. About 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2014. Of these, about 10,886, or 67%, were committed with firearms. A nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a

The New York Times, using data from the Violence Policy Center found that from 2007-2015, there were 28 mass shootings attributed to concealed carry, in which 136 people were killed (a mass shooting for the purpose of the study was defined as 3 or more victims). A different New York Times report also found that 8,124 people were killed in the United States in 2014, about 27 a day. The report also found that in the same time frame there were at least 722 non-self defense deaths, which lessens the self defense reason for buying a gun. In these, 218 cases also ended with the gun owner committing suicide (Concealed). This calls into question the mental health of some concealed carry owners, and that there need to be stricter requirements for

In 2009-2016, 156 times gun violence occurred in the United States. Due to which 848 people died in mass shooting and 339 people got injured. After the shooting 66 criminals killed themselves and another 17 were killed by police force. 54 percent shooting occurred due to family breakdown and mental illness (Every Town, 2017).

When it comes to guns people think about mass shootings around the U.S. There were 372 mass shootings in 2015 killing 475 and killing 1,870 people, a mass shooting is where there are four or more people killed or injured. Second there were 64 school shootings, Sandy Hook Elementary in Connecticut was the most known school shooting 20 students and 6 adults were killed the ages of the kids were between the age of six and seven. Out of all the shootings there were 13,286 killed and 26,819 injured per year. From 1928 to 2011 there were more people being shot and killed or injured, and suicides than from anyone dying from being shot and killed in the war. There were from people being shot and killed or suicides was 1.4 million people from the Civil War to Iraq only 1.2 million died from being shot and killed or injured. Last the U.S. spends roughly 1 trillion dollars on fighting terrorism which kills a fraction of people than people getting shot in a gun

Some people believe the best way to stop mass shootings is stricter gun laws. After the assignations of John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed. The act calls for tougher regulations on the firearm industry, new categories for firearm offenses, and it prohibits the sale of firearms and ammunition to felons. One potential positive for stricter gun control could be a drop in mass shootings. In April 1996 Australia had the deadliest mass shooting in the history of the country when 35 people were killed. Twelve days later their police minister agreed to tighten licensing and registration requirements, restricted the sale of semi-automatic weapons and limit sales. In an article by Andrew Leigh, it is said that this restriction had a positive affect at reducing the mass shootings in Australia. It also said that the Australian Government started a buyback program were people could sell their guns back for market price. Could this work in the US? Unlikely because our culture is currently obsessed with guns. The problem with this is that in

There is a large pool of murders and not only by firearms. For example, the FBI has statistics that roughly 4,000-5,000 murders were committed from 2009-2013 in the United States with weapons excluding firearms. These other weapons include the following: knives, blunt objects, personal weapons, poison, explosives, fire, narcotics, drowning, strangulation, asphyxiation and much more that

Gun control is the "government regulation of the manufacture, sale, and possession of firearms" (Legal Dictionary), and it is clear that the American approach to it is simply not working. A variety of loopholes exist that allow guns to wind up in the hands of those not qualified or permitted to use them. The scope and severity of gun violence in the United States is extreme. There are more guns per capita than anywhere else, and high amounts of both gun crime and murder per person. The extent of government varies country by country, and, in comparison to every other high-income, Western state, it is clear that the American approach to gun control and the various loopholes and workarounds that it provides leads to both higher levels of gun violence and greater levels of violence in

Gun control laws are not always effective and that is why each year they are improving them and making them to where they can be more effective. One of the laws that was the most effective was the Brady act which required all individuals that were interested in owning a gun to have a background check that was implemented by the federal government (Kwon, & Baack, 2005). This act has had a very positive impact on the crimes rates and has helped protect our society. There are many articles that show that with stricter gun laws being implemented that there are a decrease in crimes being committed throughout the United Stares (Kwon, & Baack, 2005). Studies show that countries who have low gun ownership have fewer gun related deaths. In reality if

The National Institute of Justice reported that in 1994, 35% of households owned 192 million firearms, with 65 million of those being handguns. 74% reported owning more than one. By 2000, the number had increased to 259 owned across the nation and 294 million by 2007. Retail prices vary from $75 to $1500 for a typical handgun. A gun is used in a homicide 3.2 times per 100,000 people per the FBI Crime Reports of 2011. In 2009, firearm fatalities numbered 11,826 homicides, 18,735 suicides, 554 accidental shootings and 232 unknown causes. (Congressional Digest, 5)