preview

Analyzing Historical Events

Decent Essays

Before answering the question, “should historical event be judged by the standards of their time?” we must understand what it is asking. A historical event can be defined as an event that happened in the past but is relevant today and has influence on the present. When we judge something we form a conclusion or opinion about it, so when we judge using the standards of another time period we are forming an opinion using the common or normal ideas of that era. The question can be rephrased as, “should we make conclusions about past events according to the common ideas of the era in which the event happened?” When judging historical events it is important to look at not only the context in which they occurred, but the morals and beliefs …show more content…

As the imperial government of Germany collapsed worker strikes and civil unrest caused major political parties to merge in order to suppress any uprising because they feared a communist government. The peace treaty that was imposed by the Allies caused Germany to lose more than ten percent of its territory, forced the country to dismantle its military and made them pay dividends to the Allies for causing the war. These circumstances caused many nationalists and veterans to believe that the war could have been won if not for politicians and protestors: these views became an obsession for Hitler and paranoid delusions led him to assign blame to the Jews for losing the war. Even though during this period, hundreds of thousands of Jews had become part of German society, antisemitic views became prevalent because many Germans still viewed them as outsiders. As well, many Jews were very successful after the war causing Germans to believe that the Jews helped the Allies in the defeat of Germany, however these beliefs were rooted in fear and anger. Hitler used the fears and anger of Germans to help him gain support and after President Hindenburg died Hitler became Führer of …show more content…

People have a tendency to follow what is seen as popular and at the time Nazism was seen as the correct moral standard, so should we fault the Nordic Germans for that? If we were living back in that time, would we not be a part of the majority that followed Hitler and his beliefs? Today we believe that the morals that are common are the best set of morals that exist; we believe in cultural diversity, and the proper treatment of others no matter our differences. However, in 100 years it is likely that our descendants will look back on us and ask how could we have let such acts like the Syrian Civil War occur and not put a stop to them as soon as possible. Therefore, we must ask ourselves, how do social values impact the way that events are perceived? During Hitler’s regime society valued the advancement of the Nordic Germans and the disenfranchisement of anyone who was considered other, and so they used this value as a way to justify the mistreatment of the others. In Nazi Germany, Germans believed that they were better than those which the Nazi Party claimed as lesser, a view deemed as normal at the time, however those that still believe it today are deemed as outrageous and wrong. When we look at the rise of Hitler, Nazi Germany and the Holocaust, most people will say that it was a heinous and

Get Access