Analysis Of Violent Video Games Harm Our Kids

Whether violent media content leads to real-life violence is always debatable. And in recent years, school shootings have made video games a new focus of public concern and scientific research. In public opinion, video games cause more aggression in comparison to traditional violent media contents because video games have more features of interactivity, "due to the active engagement and participation of players" (Hummer and Wang et al. 137). But more and more reports tell us that video games are not the main cause of school shooting issues; rather it is the negligence of parents, schools, and communities.

A ponderous medium of media is video games in co-relation to violence. Video games encourage violent behavior in children as they are at a crucial stage of adaptation.

While violent video games have increased as a form of entertainment, an issue has begun to form on whether violent video games have a negative impact on children and adolescents. Steven F. Gruel (2010) formed an argument about the negative impacts of violent video games on children. The purpose of this paper is to critique Gruel’s argument by finding flaws and strengths using the methods of claims without data, overgeneralization, failing to cite sources, and considering alternative explanations.

There is overwhelming scientific research that suggests that playing violent video games are harmful to children and adolescents. The scientific evidence has uncovered several areas in the development of children and adolescent that are negatively impacted because of the exposure to and playing of violent video games. Some of the key areas that are negatively affected include brain activity, stress levels and behavior.

Americans have been blaming violent forms of entertainment since colonial times. From dime novels to music, to movies to television shows. The most recent medium are video games. Aided by crime-saturated news reports, a lot of people are convinced that video game violence transfers to real-life youth crimes like the school massacres. They think that violent video games make people violent, but that is not the case. Violent people play violent video games. Not everyone who plays video games are violent, but those who already are violent will play them as an outlet for their frustration and rage. If anything, video games keep violent people from going out and killing people in real life because they can vent in the virtual world.

Violent video games cause dangerous and, aggressive thoughts to appear, and may make people act out in violent ways causing them to become harmful to their surroundings. In addition to making the player aggressive, violent video games are also linked to criminal activity. According to the article, "Do Games like 'Grand Theft Auto V' Cause Real-World Violence?", “The Aurora shooter, James Holmes, the Sandy Hook shooter, Adam Lanza, they’re all described as essentially being addicted to video games” (Kain 1). Becoming addicted to video games, like these people, can reflect in actions, making gamers dangerous. On top of causing aggression playing violent video games, “Increases the likelihood that a person will commit a violent crime, like murder or assault” (Carey 1). Playing violent video games is harmful to the player and, their surroundings because they can have sudden outbursts causing harm to others. Video games, especially addictive, and violent games, are linked to criminal activity and, make people addicted, and harmful.Some people think that if they distract children with enjoyable video games it will cause them to be too distracted to do anything else, like violent behavior.

The first piece of evidence the author of article one provides is "Between 1995 and 2008 there was an incredible decline in youth violence across America. The arrest rate for teens that committed violent crimes fell by half." Next she gives a 2004 study conducted by the U.S. Secret Service the shows that only one in eight school shooters had an interest in violent video games. She goes on to say they had a much larger interest in violent movies, books, and their own writings.

In their research of violent videogames and the effect on children, they have found that “the simplistic belief that exposure to media violence will lead directly to individual violence is clearly wrong.” (Kutner, Olsen, 2008) I am going to ask you to look deeper than this. I assert that although violent video games are thought to encourage real world violence, they actually help to prevent it.

With various numbers, despite everything it is not demonstrated that violent video games can negatively affect kids. In any case, it's reasonable that violent video games can add to youth violence. Mirror neurons are cerebrum cells that demonstration of individuals' sympathy for other in violent games, individuals have an opportunity to slaughter individuals or animals inside of feeling compassion for the individuals who are executed. Children regularly lose their feeling of reality and fiction and violent video games have been demonstrated that it can urge children to act savagely. A Clinician have affirmed playing violent video games is connected to forceful and insensitive conduct. Children are not influenced by pursuing a violent book the same way they are from a violent game. Kids may not completely comprehend that they individuals they people have genuine lives and genuine families. Subsequent to doing violent video games are to say rebuked for some things and youth roughness is one, alongside school shootings, forceful conduct, viciousness toward ladies and other criminal conduct. Since there is no official examination done to demonstrate savage computer games add to youth roughness there is not a lot anybody can do. Parents should limit on how long their children are allowed to play the game per day. 75% parents believe that the parental controls available in new

In “Do Video Games Kill”, Karen Sternheimer does an excellent job in supporting Wright's views of video games not being destructive. As stated earlier, many people, especially elders tend to view games as violent, childish, and hurtful to society. This reason being because of media news portals, “The two boys apparently responsible for the massacre in Littleton, Colo. Last week were, among many other things, accomplished players of the ultraviolet video game, Doom” (Sternheimer). Many reports and articles have been written linking violent games to the being the cause of teens mass shootings. However, Sternheimer rebuts the studies by looking at the sources of research being presented to the media as “credible”. Many studies done have “linked” violent games to the shooters aggression, but they fail to state all factors such as “poverty, neighborhood instability, unemployment, and even family violence…” (Sternheimer). All these factors are never presented when researching the cause of the boys

It is agreeable that there are some correlation between teenagers playing video games and how it affects the youth mentally. Heavy consumption of violence video games does indeed stimulate a change reaction in the brain waves, but there is no hard evidence stating that those changes causes teenagers to act aggressively and violently. On the contrary, it is a popular beliefs that violence video games does indeed causes teenagers to displayed unpleasant behaviors and actions because that is what they learned and observed from the games. Therefore, parents should limit and regulate the amount of time their teenagers are playing violence video games so that they can protect their children from negative behaviors.

Video games have become a staple in the entertainment industry. Families coming from various backgrounds across the world own a video game system. Shooting games such as call of duty have become particularly popular amongst young teenagers. These types of games have led to a very popular debate. The question being do violent video games make children violent? Prosecutor Steven F. Gruel believes that they do cause children to become violent while defense attorney Patricia A. Millett argues that there is not enough evidence to prove this to be true.

“ , says that “It is not hard to ‘link’ video game playing with violent acts if one wishes to do so, as one video game playing prevalence study indicated that 98.7% of adolescents play video games to some degree”. What Ferguson tries to explain is that for anyone trying to correlate teenagers committing violent crimes and the amount of time playing video games is hardly evidence of anything. Trying to prove that a behavior, such as video gamming, so highly common amongst teenagers is the cause of a rare behavioral incidence, as a school shooting, is highly

Now the question you may ask yourself does this link between video games and violence hold up? With that said you must think about the millions who played these games every day. Why are there not more crimes like this if video games have something to do with violence? Pathological acts of course have multiple complex causes and are hard to predict. (http://www.slate.com/id/2164065/)

Over the years, the popularity of computer and video games has grown. Specifically violent video games make up more than 50 % of the top selling games. These games include violent themes that involve guns, crime, blood, and gore. There is an ongoing belief that these types of games are to blame for the many acts of violence in society and have encouraged America’s youth to act out in aggression. Several organizations, such as the PTC (Parents Television Council) have moved to discourage the development of violent games while also pushing for stronger regulations when purchasing such games. There is also debate among parents and concerns on how games can negatively influence their children. So is there a direct link between video games and violence? The truth is video games do not encourage violence in society based on several factors which include scientific studies, statistics on crime, and prevention measures adopted by game publishers.