The robot performed exceptionally well within the competition, when it was not victim of an un-calibrated colour sensor and a faulty breakout board. It was one of the few robots that could successfully navigate home and did so the most reliably due to the usage of the gyro which neither competitors within the final utilized to travel home. Had the breakout board error not been present causing the robot to crash, and the colour sensor correctly tuned to the arena lighting, all rounds would have more closely emulated that of round four, if not surpassed it. Furthermore, had our unload mechanism been entirely removed from the software, an average of 1.9kgs would have been collected per round, as opposed to the 1.25kg due to six weights …show more content…
To resolve this issue a front unloading mechanism would be implemented. This would mean that the robot would not need to enter far into the base, significantly reducing the chance that a collected weight is pushed from the home base. If this had been implemented then the robot would have had more chances at collecting and returning home without the risk of removing collected weights from the base. This is potentially a competition winning change.
The final design of the robot could only detect weights on the right-hand side. To double the chances of a weight being detected a second weight detection pole should be implemented on the left Perspex guide. This would add a further 100 degrees to the robot’s field of vision. The coding of the weight detection could also have been improved as the robot often became unreliable when the detection pole was close to walls. To solve this the logic implemented to detect weights would need to be made more reliable by including a specific case when both read a value lower than a certain number.
The final feature that should be implemented is to increase the range of the weight detection pole. The final design used a short-range IR sensor to account for the minimum operating distance limitations. However, if a medium IR sensor was also incorporated into this design then the maximum range could be increased to 50 cm whilst still being able to reliably detect weights close to the robot. The ability of
Eventually, this causes her to regret her decision. She takes the robot to a cliffside and orders it to jump off it. She tells the robot it is “just a performance of stuff that he performed without thinking, and it’s not enough” (Harris).
The pendulum was pulled to about 15 cm from the motion detector. In case of the mass on a spring, the mass was pulled till just a few inches away from the motion detector.
After the experiment had been conducted, the investigator concluded that the original hypothesis did not fit the outcome of the testing of the Beetle Robot. While it was hypothesized that the device would move and react in the same
\emph{Serial.out} function from Arduino is used to send and receive some data from the robot. This was used to test whether this communication is working according to the requirements.
Continuing with the development and improvement of the assembly line, in the 1960s, new machines were invented that allowed for five axes of motion. These devices were called the “Versatran”, and were installed a Ford factory in Ohio. But later in the decade, robots became even more complex adding another axis it can work
In the beginning of the article he immediately starts off by telling the readers what the capabilities of the robot are: “In one clip the robot walks on a treadmill… An engineer slips a 2x4 under its foot simulating an obstacle... and the robot ably steps over it. Cut to the robot standing on
B.ii. The weight on the collar keep the transponder in the correct position at 11’oclock to allow the robot to receive the information gathered.
The Vasteras Giraff is a new breakthrough in the healthcare industry. Through new innovation that has been developed by Giraff Technologies of Sweden, communication could be changed forever. This device is essentially a mobile communication tool with wheels, a camera, and a monitor—all remote controlled. Think of it as a two-way video communication system on wheels. Its main function is to provide the housebound or elderly with a communication system. I believe this device is a positive solution to an ongoing problem as the population continues to age, and there is more need for home healthcare. This robot helps elderly people communicate with the outside world without leaving their home.
Allen, Paul G., and Mark Greaves. "The Singularity Isn't Near." MIT Technology Review 12 Oct. 2011: n. pag. Rpt. in Robotic Technology. Ed. Louise Gerdes. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Oct. 2015. .
Concept/Fact #3: That smaller wheels can create more force and it can help with the mass of the sumobot.
These robots are starting to become human-like androids. According to the author, he thinks not everyone will be ready for the new robots to take over. Scientists for many years have tried to accomplish the task of copying nature, and only now has this idea become a possibility. For example, Andrew Vardy who is a Canadian computer science professor, invented his own smaller robots. He made these to clean up pucks off a miniature arena. These robots had a special quality Vardy added, which was to “view” where it’s going from using small on-board cameras. Another key point, Baxter is the name of a robot that’s purpose is for industrial use. It has a computer screen face and is programmed to stop in its tracks if a person gets in the way, instead of attacking the person. Baxter has five cameras that make it possible for it to look at what it’s doing, and in case an object gets in the way it knows to stop. In the past years,
The two force sensors (CI-6746) that are mounted on the toy trucks are connected to the Data Studio Interface. Truck 1 is connected to Channel A and Truck 2 is connected to Truck2. Before taking the readings, the TARE button located on top of the sensors was pressed in order to zero the readings. To confirm the proper working of the sensors the trucks are pushed but not made to collide and a straight-line graph is observed. The sample rate set for the experiment is 200 Hz, which is not as slow as 10 Hz or not very fast as 1000 Hz. This enables us to acquire accurate results during the course of the experiment.
The three laws, Law I: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. Law II: A robot must obey orders given by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. Law III: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. This is the very essence of I, Robot (2004) by Alex Proyas a world created to co-exist with robots. Man-made robots which signifies the result of a creative and innovative fast paced world full of greed and consumption. What appears as utopia is really a dystopia and not unlike the world we live in today. Just because something is attractive doesn’t mean that there isn’t something unattractive
Domestic robots or service robots are machines designed to accomplish household chores. These robots are slowly becoming more and more popular in our growing world. “Starting from humble beginnings in the middle of the twentieth century, the field has seen great successes in
On the graph there are some minor anomalous results such as trial 3 of mass 200 gram, where the acceleration is 0.2m/s^2 closer to the 500 gram average then the average of the two other trials for 200 g force. Outlier could be caused by multiple factors such as incorrect or inconsistent method of dropping the weight or the miss positioning of the trolley creating an awkward starting angle and direction.