Essay on Against Racial Profiling

Although there have been numerous assassination plots and attempts, there have only been four successful presidential assassinations in the history of the U.S. Today I’ll be comparing and contrasting two different president killers: John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald. They lived almost a century apart, but still have many similarities. Lee and John basically did the same crime, assassinating a U.S President, however, they have numerous differences.

There have been many attempts to make racial profiling illegal, but all have failed. Racial profiling is defined as suspecting an individual of a wrongdoing based solely on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin (Racial Profliling: Definition 2). Racism spreads throughout all dimensions of life in American society; therefore, the history of racial profiling is extensive, but it was at an all-time high after the September 11th attacks (Persistence of racial and ethnic profiling in the United States: a follow-up report to the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination 10). It can be used in both positive and negative aspects, but is mostly used negatively. Racial profiling negatively effects society and the very existence of racial profiling is erroneous, discriminatory, and unjustifiable.

Every individual in the world is different in some way from the person standing next to them. People differ in their culture, ethnicity, race, religion, personality, styles, interest, appearance and more. It is understood that someone may be similar to you not one person will be exactly like you. Growing up it is important for one to understand the differences of other people and show a level of respect for them. As human-beings, people typically learn through experiences. However, these experiences have the tendency to alter the way people perceive other individuals. Racial profiling, a term used more frequently when dealing with law enforcement, is defined as “any action undertaken for reasons of safety, security or public protection

Racial profiling is a controversial issue because although police use it to prevent crime, the opposing view claims that innocent people are stopped for no logical reason making them feel unequal. In fact, in the article “I was Racially Profiled in My Own Driveway” by Doug Glanville, is an example of why people oppose this, it shows how a police officer stopped and questioned a black man (himself) shoveling his own driveway even when it was out of his own jurisdiction. Little did the police know but the man was Doug Glanville, a retired MLB player, trying to clear out snow. However, not knowing who Glanville was, the police was under the impression that Glanville was out in the neighborhood trying to make money. Nonetheless, as soon as the police officer found out that Glanville was shoveling his own driveway of his household, he paces away. As Glanville clarifies, “After a few minutes, he headed back to his vehicle. He offered no apology, just an empty encouragement to enjoy my shoveling. And he was gone” (Glanville 8). What Glanville is really saying here is that a cop went out of his jurisdiction just to confront Glanville because he is black and was in a wealthy neighborhood. This ultimately ruined Glanville’s day by wiping off his smile since he had been racially profiled as a suspicious suspect to the police. This is a clear example on why people are against the use of

Racial profiling in the dictionary is “the assumption of criminality among ethnic groups: the alleged policy of some police to attribute criminal intentions to members of some ethnic groups and to stop and question them in disproportionate numbers without probable cause (“Racial Profiling”).” In other words racial profiling is making assumptions that certain individuals are more likely to be involved in misconduct or criminal activity based on that individual’s race or ethnicity. Racial profiling propels a brutalizing message to citizens of the United States that they are pre-judged by the color of their skin rather than who they are and this then leads to assumptions of ruthlessness inside the American criminal justice system. With

Racial profiling is still an ongoing issue that occurs and such an issue has led to many problems for the minority groups of this country. Whether it be African Americans, Indians, Asians, Mexicans, or Muslims, all have faced profiling at some point in time. The problems caused by this controversial subject include the impending distrust between black communities and law enforcement, unfair treatment towards all minorities by law enforcement, verbal and physical abuse of minorities by police officers which can sometimes lead to death, emotional unstableness of the victims whom have faced such a terrible judgement, and the negative impact it has on children of the minority groups.

Even the United States struggles with issues of racial discrimination despite being a society highly based on immigrants and multicultural diversity. On one hand, people frown on treatment based on race, whether that is on an individual or group level. On the other, people are tired and annoyed by the seemingly constant call of discrimination. All of these feelings culminate into the debate pertaining to the use of racial profiling. Likewise, there are some individuals that hold a certain level of acceptance in regard to racial profiling. However, what is lost in the process because of that acceptance? There are many components that need to be thought about in reference to the use of racial profiling. In addition, it can be viewed

There are many types of racism in America that cause people to make accusations against law enforcement for discrimination. One type of racism is racial profiling. It is a strategy that encourages police officers to stop and question minorities only because of their race. Racial profiling is a serious issue of social importance in the United States. George Will opens by casting doubt with his tone on the idea that racial profiling is a serious issue in America. His tone is sarcastic and critical of how politicians and news people are talking about the issue, and The focus of the article is to use Heather Mac Donald as the primary evidence for Will's view that racial profiling is not necessarily bad. I believe there is racism still happening to black people and Muslim people. Racial profiling is an unfavorable thing, and it can be a huge problem lead to a scuffle and law enforcement should work to stop racism forever in the whole world.

Although Johnson was not the one who pulled the trigger on that November day, he might have enlisted assassins to kill Kennedy. Witnesses did not see these hired assassins but their intuition gave clues as to what was invaluable toward solving this major case.

Many historians get assassinated in this throughout the years four presidents have been assassinated. Abraham Lincoln got assassinated on February 12th, 1809 by John Wilkes. The assassination of Abraham Lincoln was unjust because he freed slaves and he united the country; however some people believe he started the civil war. Abraham Lincoln freed slaves, he wrote the Emancipation Proclamation then all the slaves was free but not right away. According to the Emancipation Proclamation “All person held as slaves within any state or designated part of a state that people whereof shall be then there forward, and forever free” (Lincoln 1).

The most accepted theory on which assassin it really was is that he was Lee Harvey Oswald.

Racial profiling has become a severe obstacle in the U.S. today though most Americans know very little of this vital issue. Every day, people are being pulled over, harassed, and even killed for being of a certain race. There are new laws that politicians are trying to pass that promote racial discrimination. Racial profiling is immoral and does not increase public safety.

Being politically assassinated is really no easy task to do. For example: During the presidential debate that happened at the Al Smith Dinner for a charity on October 20th, 2016 there was a heated battle between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. The two politicians were roasting each other back and forth in a “jokingly” matter but in the audience’s eyes, it seemed like a direct “attack” between one another. One of the lines which Trump said, shocked many of the guests who attended the charity that day. “Hillary is so corrupt, she got kicked off the Watergate Commission.” And going into Clinton’s own speech, she also went as far as to humiliate Trump in her own way. “Donald wanted me drug tested before last night’s debate. Look I got to tell

The description of the mysterious assassin who killed President Lincoln includes many details about the body, shape, clothing, height, appearance, and much more. Along with the person who attempted to do the same to Hon. W. H. Seward, Secretary of State

Benjamin Disraeli once said, “Assassination has never changed the history of the world.” To clarify, although assassinations do matter, no one knows their fate and it remains outside of their control. Multiple individuals have theories that if one assassinates another, it could lead to positive or negative outcomes. Professor, James Fetzer, in his article, “JFK and RFK: The Plots that Killed Them, The Patsies that Didn’t,” expresses that what happened to John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy is crucial. Fetzer’s purpose is to inform readers that many theories need to be analyzed thoroughly before believing in one specific one. He creates an interesting tone in order to appeal to the brain power of individuals.