preview

Abuse Of Power In The Monkey's Paw

Decent Essays

Throughout history, there has been many experiences where the abuse of power showed a backlash that caused it’s wielder great harm. When speaking in context of the use of unhealthy power that leads to appalling consequences, it can be seen that the abuse of power causes a battle between conscience and the hunger for superiority, where the strength of the power correlates with the hunger for it. A story called “The Monkey’s Paw” displays a talisman as a virtually unlimited source of power. Within the story, there is a man named Sergeant-Major Morris that is welcomed into the home of the main characters, Mrs. and Mr. White. Sergeant Major tries to burn the monkey’s paw (talisman), but instead has Mr. White snatch it before it's destruction. …show more content…

White after being given the power of the monkey’s paw. On page three in the story, the writer drops a small clue that describes Mr. White’s thoughts by showing his external facial features. “His father, smiling shamefacedly at his own credulity, held up the talisman, as his son (Jacobs 3)...” The description “shamefacedly” shows that Mr. White had a feeling of guilt for his doing, suggesting that there was a slight internal battle before his abuse of power that granted him his wish. This is all happening a moment before his first wish, showing that he had thought about the idea of exploiting the power coming from the talisman. Provided that Mr. White has not used the talisman yet, it can be seen that he does not feel wrongdoing from completing an action. Instead, the man is incorporating thought into his future actions. The character's thinking can only point to two different directions in the category of the monkey’s paw; he can use the monkey’s paw to wish or he can listen to Sergeant Major’s words and abstain the wish for 200 pounds. This is an internal conflict. The two sides consist of scruples and desire for power. The scruples is the moral consciousness inside of Mr. White’s head telling him to stay away from the monkey’s paw. Opposing this force, is the desire for power that is telling the old man that his inclination is to wish for something greedy. Given all these points, the conclusion can be …show more content…

The story somewhat followed the moral because every time Mr. White wished using the monkey’s paw, he evidently created consequences for himself, which causes people to think that the old man should be more careful of what he wishes for. This could be a powerful theme, but it fails to account for some dialog from Sergeant-Major. On the second page of The Monkey’s Paw, it stated: ““It had a spell put on it by an old fakir," said the sergeant-major, "a very holy man. He wanted to show that fate ruled people's lives, and that those who interfered with it did so to their sorrow().”” Clearly, any wishes that changed fate in any way would damage the wielder him/herself. Therefore, the only type of wish that would not be damaging are wishes that would do nothing. Wishing for nothing is not really a wish so that implies that every single wish would lead to a repercussion. Under these circumstances, it is impossible to be careful for what you wish for if every single wish will be damaging. As a result, this moral cannot be implied within the story, making the original one more relevant within the

Get Access