38 Who Saw Hollander Analysis

Individuals in life or death situations should not be held accountable for their action. They are obviously going to want to be alive and happy, and not die or live in misery, so victims would most likely do whatever it takes to survive. Whoever made the decisions weren’t fully thinking it through because we all develop mentally at a different age for children and adults. Individuals who are in life or death situations don’t put themselves in that positions purposely to where they know they can die. In situations like these, everyone feels stress to the point where they have no other option until it is too late when they make their final choice like what happened in “The Seventh Man”

all to see. Nowhere else in our civilized nations can people witness death up close

So she obtains the case files and wants to get Helen’s opinion on the case. At first Helen is reluctant to help because as M.J. Monaham starts to

Many families have gone through this tough decision. In the article, “Mercy Killing is Not a Crime Endash; It is a Brave and Selfless Act of Love,” France Inglis killed her son at age 22 after months of watching him suffer. The was put in this state from falling “from an ambulance and hit his head on the pavement” (A N Wilson). With no hope left of him recovering, “His brave mother, who is studying for a nursing diploma, tried to kill him by the injection of pure heroin” (A N Wilson). This was not an act of hate or selfish reasons, but out of love for her son, and didn't want him to suffer longer than he already has. After being arrested for attempting to mercy kill her son, she tried again, this time successful. “I held everything was going to be fine, that he will be fine. I hoped he had died. He was very peaceful” (A N Wilson). This quote makes it certain that this was done with pure love, “If Tom Inglis had been starved to death and agonisingly deprived of water until he died of thirst and dehydration, that act of cruelty would have been within the law” (A N

Death is inevitable, but do we ride it out until the bitter end or chose a quick and painless death? Many people are against the idea of physician-assisted suicide and others aren’t such as Faye Girish writer of the article “Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legalized?” Published in 1999 in Insight on the News, she argues that the legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide will allow those who wish to die a peaceful way to do so. Faye establishes the building of her credibility with plausible facts and statistics, great emotional appeal, and personal sources. However, throughout the article several times she attempts to use pity to guilt people into agreeing with her argument, uses celebrities as sources, and doesn’t cite some of her sources questioning her credibility and finally, her argument.

On March 13, 1964, a woman named Kitty Genovese was stabbed repeatedly while several neighbors were vaguely aware of the unfolding events occurring outside. The lack of action on the neighbors’ part led to Genovese dying shortly after. Why did Kitty Genovese’s neighbors fail to take action quickly?

Reasonable people will generally go a long distance to protect their loved-ones. However, most reasonable people would believe that killing someone else in order to protect their loved ones would be immoral and harmful. In the case of R v. Buzizi [2013], a man killed another in a supposed effort to protect his cousin. On an early morning in Montréal, the accused’s cousin and the victim ensued in a brawl. The initial fight was broken up by a third party. A few moments later, the accused, Mr. Buzizi, who saw the initial assault from afar, intervened and pushed the victim. Then, Mr. Buzizi noticed that the victim had an exacto knife, and that his cousin had a serious wound on his neck. For fear that the victim was going to pull out the

The direct arguments in physicians-assisted suicide state that under no circumstances is the killing of another human being justified. Life is precious no matter how low the quality is and, should be valued at all times.

[As their] murder [can be] thoughtful, deliberate and cunning in it planning and execution” (Weir 13) as this is cruel and an unusual punishment for the victims. We need to keep in mind that the victim could be a daughter, cousin, sister, mother, a loved one that’s why they need justice. Who know how much pain they were going through as they were getting attacked by a victim they thought was an average person like them. The worries about if they might live or not to see their loved one they thought would be able to see forever. This is why criminals need to take responsibility for their actions they

Pressing for families and their loved ones, an act to be decided for somebody suffering from pain – physician-assisted suicide is a touchy subject for many. In cases where the intolerable suffering can be judged by the patient, physicians should extend their hands to initiate euthanasia through ethical means. I would say that it can be justified when terminal illnesses restrict the patient in a hospital bed with only the plug binding themselves to their bodies. I would say that it can be justified when the hastened death of somebody would benefit others, when the burden of a human, so sick, carries onto others. It is a fact that a life support program for somebody without the will to live can cost thousands of dollars, in contrast to the smaller

On May 6th 1997, Dr. Nancy Morrison was charged with the first-degree murder of Paul Mills by the means of non-voluntary active euthanasia. Paul Mills was a terminally ill patient who suffered from esophageal cancer. In October of 1996, Mr. Mills had undergone nine surgeries as the result of a post-surgical infection (Fisher, p. 262). As the infection progressed, a Do Not Resuscitate order was put in effect and his family made the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment, which should consequently cause a natural death to occur, known as passive euthanasia (Fisher, p. 191). However, Mr. Mills did not then die as expected. His attending nurse Elizabeth Bland-MacInnes described him as suffering and struggling to breathe. After being begged by Ms. Bland MacInnes to end the patient's suffering, Dr. Nancy Morrison injected Mr. Mills with nitroglycerin which should have decreased his blood pressure and as a result, decreased his suffering (Fisher, p. 262). However, this attempt failed and Dr. Morrison proceeded to inject the patient with potassium chloride, consequently ending Mr. Mills life. In acting upon the biomedical ethics principle of beneficence, Dr. Nancy Morrison’s decision to inject Paul Mills with potassium chloride is ethically justifiable.

If you see one thing it's not always what it may seem to be. You may not know what happen before you showed up to the crime scene. Crimes are often given the death penalty but the person committed the crime in an act of self defense. As stated in The Princeton Tory, in 1995 an man named Robert Massie killed Mildred Weiss while robbing her and her

Justice along with closure, is a large argument that most people bring up while debating this topic. “But the only reason Belinda Crites needs to support the death penalty is ‘what Eric Nance did to my cousin.’” (Santhanam). The argument of whether families of the victim get closure or not is entirely based on opinions. Though most people say that it is more revenge than justice, many families believe that with the proper execution of the criminal, it sets their mind at ease. "The verdict, undoubtedly a

The lack of consensus; thereof, in American society on the ethical question of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide could be attributed solely to the incredibly complexity and gravity of the issue. Therefore, in this study I will suggest, explore, and discuss that part of the ethical problem with euthanasia is under what circumstances, if any,

The source gives a more description of the murder scene. It gives a more details about the edvinces found throughout the body of the deceased girl. The source also gives a more details about how the how court was taking place during of when the case was taking place. The article was produced by Leonard Dinnerstein. The author is reliable because he is a professor of Judaic Studies and history at the University of Arizona. The article is an extracted piece of Dinnerstein’s book about Leo Frank. I will use this source to help me write a more detail information about the crime scene and how the evidence found at the scene was used against Leo