How did your classmates

.docx

School

Yale University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

434

Subject

Political Science

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by EarlLark2079 on coursehero.com

How did your classmates' presentations help you better understand the policy issue they addressed?   My understanding of the policy issues my classmates discussed has improved in multiple ways as a result of their presentations. They started by giving me a thorough rundown of the problem, including its background, present situation, and future directions. Second, they outlined the main defenses and objections to the proposed policy change. Thirdly, they gave me fresh insight into the matter by sharing their viewpoints and experiences. What kinds of strategies and processes did they use to make the case for their policy? My classmates used a variety of strategies and processes to make the case for their policy changes. Some of the most common strategies included: Using data and evidence:  My classmates often used data and evidence to support their arguments. This could include statistics, research findings, and expert testimony. Telling personal stories:  My classmates also used personal stories to illustrate the impact of the policy issue and to connect with their audience on an emotional level. Framing the issue:  My classmates carefully framed the issue in a way that would be persuasive to their audience. This involved highlighting the benefits of the policy change and minimizing the drawbacks. Addressing counterarguments:  My classmates also addressed potential counterarguments to their policy changes. This showed that they had carefully considered all sides of the issue and that they were confident in their position. What questions or concerns do you have regarding this policy change? I have a few questions and concerns regarding some of the policy changes that my classmates advocated for.  For example,  one classmate advocated for a universal basic income (UBI). While I am supportive of the idea of a UBI, I am concerned about the cost of implementing such a policy. I am also concerned about how to ensure that a UBI would be implemented fairly and equitably. Play the devil's advocate: What would your argument be against this policy? If I were playing the devil's advocate, I would argue against the policy change by raising the following concerns: Cost:  Some policy changes, such as a UBI, would be very expensive to implement. This could lead to higher taxes or cuts to other important programs. Effectiveness:  There is no guarantee that a policy change will be effective in achieving its intended goals. Some policy changes can have unintended negative consequences. Equity:  Some policy changes may benefit certain groups of people more than others. This could lead to increased inequality. How would you help your classmates argue against the opposition? I would help my classmates argue against the opposition by: Anticipating counterarguments:  I would help my classmates to anticipate potential counterarguments to their policy changes and to develop responses to those counterarguments. Using evidence:  I would help my classmates to gather and use data and evidence to support their arguments.
Framing the issue:  I would help my classmates frame the issue in a way that would be persuasive to their audience. Building coalitions:  I would help my classmates to build coalitions with other groups and individuals who support their policy change. How feasible is it to implement this policy? The feasibility of implementing a policy change will vary depending on the specific policy. Some policy changes may be relatively easy to implement, while others may be very difficult. It is important to consider the following factors when assessing the feasibility of a policy change: Cost:  How much will it cost to implement the policy change? Political will:  Is there enough political support for the policy change? Administrative capacity:  Does the government have the capacity to implement the policy change effectively? What unintended consequences do you see as a result of this policy? All policy changes have the potential to have unintended consequences. Some of the most common unintended consequences include: Increased costs:  The cost of implementing a policy change may be higher than anticipated. Reduced effectiveness:  A policy change may not be as effective as intended in achieving its goals. Increased inequality:  A policy change may benefit certain groups of people more than others, leading to increased inequality. Unintended negative impacts:  A policy change may have unintended negative impacts on certain groups of people or the economy as a whole. What are the fiscal implications and political viability of this policy? The fiscal implications of vaping control measures vary depending on the specific policy being proposed. Some policies, such as universal health checks, may be relatively inexpensive to implement, while other policies, such as a ban on tobacco use, may be more costly. The political viability of vaping  control measures is also low, due to the strong vaping lobby and the Second Amendment rights of citizens. However, there is some public support for vaping control measures, such as universal background checks. Overall, my classmates' presentations helped me better understand the complex issue of vaping in adolescents in school and the challenges of implementing vaping control measures. I am still undecided on the best way to address this issue, but I appreciate the opportunity to learn more about it and to consider different perspectives .  
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help