EthicsAssignment1

.docx

School

Western Governors University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

C206

Subject

Management

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by ColonelBoar3829 on coursehero.com

A1 + A2. Discuss nonfictional leader and ethical traits. Elon Musk, the enigmatic entrepreneur and CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has been a polarizing figure in the business world. While his management style has been subject to scrutiny, there are undeniably ethical traits that he has consistently demonstrated as a leader. In this response, we will explore two key ethical traits that Elon Musk has exhibited and delve into instances where he has showcased ethical conduct. 1. Visionary Ethical Leadership: One of the most distinctive ethical traits Elon Musk embodies is visionary leadership. Musk possesses an unwavering commitment to his long-term vision of a sustainable future. His pursuit of electric vehicles and renewable energy through Tesla is a testament to his dedication to combating climate change. Musk has not only set ambitious goals for his companies but has actively worked towards achieving them, pushing the boundaries of innovation. This visionary approach, deeply rooted in ethical considerations, reflects Musk's commitment to creating a positive impact on the environment and society (Shephard, 2023). Tesla's mission to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy aligns with Musk's ethical stance on environmental issues. By driving the development and adoption of electric vehicles, Musk seeks to reduce humanity's dependence on fossil fuels, mitigating the detrimental effects of climate change. This commitment to a greater cause illustrates Musk's ethical leadership in prioritizing the long-term well-being of the planet over short-term gains. 2. Transparency and Accountability: Another noteworthy ethical trait demonstrated by Elon Musk is his commitment to transparency and accountability. Musk has been known for his openness in communication, both with his employees and the public. Even in the face of challenges or setbacks, Musk has maintained a level of transparency that is unusual for leaders of his stature. For instance, during the production challenges faced by Tesla, Musk openly acknowledged the issues, providing regular updates on the company's progress. This transparency fosters a culture of trust and accountability within the organization. Musk's use of social media, particularly Twitter, has been both a strength and a source of controversy. However, his willingness to engage directly with the public and address concerns showcases a leader who takes responsibility for his actions and decisions. This transparency extends to his personal challenges as well, such as publicly acknowledging and addressing mental health struggles. By being forthright about his own experiences, Musk contributes to destigmatizing mental health issues and underscores the importance of acknowledging vulnerabilities as part of responsible leadership. Exhibiting Ethical Conduct: Beyond specific traits, Elon Musk's overall conduct reflects a commitment to ethical principles. Notably, Musk has exhibited ethical behavior by championing fair labor practices. In contrast to some tech industry norms, Musk has advocated for and implemented improved working conditions for employees at Tesla's factories. This includes efforts to prevent excessive overtime and ensuring worker safety. Musk's recognition of the importance of a healthy work-life balance and the well-being of his employees reflects a commitment to ethical business practices.
Moreover, Musk has demonstrated ethical conduct through philanthropy. His involvement in various charitable initiatives, including contributions to educational programs and research, showcases a commitment to giving back to society. Musk has pledged significant portions of his wealth to address global challenges, such as advancing renewable energy technologies and addressing the threats posed by artificial intelligence. This philanthropic engagement aligns with ethical principles of corporate social responsibility and making a positive impact beyond the realm of business. In conclusion, Elon Musk's leadership is marked by ethical traits such as visionary thinking, transparency, and accountability. His commitment to addressing environmental challenges, coupled with a transparent communication style and a focus on social responsibility, sets a noteworthy example in the business world. While Musk may be a controversial figure, his ethical conduct and leadership traits contribute to shaping a future that goes beyond mere corporate success, emphasizing a broader responsibility towards the well-being of the planet and its inhabitants. B. Compare the deontological and consequentialist perspectives and how each perspective would approach the dilemma from the scenario. Deontological Perspective: Deontology is an ethical framework that emphasizes “the inherent nature of actions, focusing on duty, rules, and moral principles” (Ben-Haim 2021). From a deontological standpoint, an individual adheres to certain moral rules and obligations, and the morality of an action is determined by whether it aligns with those rules. In the given scenario, a deontologist might approach the dilemma as follows: 1. Duty to Truth and Informed Consent: Deontologists prioritize duties and obligations. In this case, there is a duty to truth and informed consent. The sales representative has a moral obligation to disclose the potential side effect of the artificial knee joint to the medical professionals and patients. 2. Nondisclosure Agreement: While the sales representative signed a nondisclosure agreement (NDA), a deontologist might argue that there are higher moral duties that override contractual obligations. In this case, the duty to prevent harm and promote informed decision-making may take precedence over the contractual obligation to keep information confidential. 3. Universalizability: Deontologists often consider whether their actions could be universalized as a moral principle. If the sales representative were to withhold crucial information about potential risks, and this became a standard practice in the industry, it could lead to a situation where patients are not adequately informed about the potential dangers of medical devices. 4. Consequences as Secondary: Deontologists typically do not prioritize consequences as the primary determinant of morality. Even if the consequences of disclosing the information could lead to negative repercussions for the sales representative, the deontological perspective would argue that fulfilling one's duty takes precedence. Consequentialist Perspective: Consequentialism is an ethical framework that evaluates the morality of an action based on its outcomes or consequences (Isufi, 2022). From a consequentialist standpoint, the morality of an action is determined by the overall balance of good and bad consequences. In the given scenario: 1. Greatest Good for the Greatest Number: A consequentialist might argue that the overall good of providing a less expensive artificial knee joint with reduced healing time could outweigh the
harm caused by the potential side effect. The focus would be on maximizing positive outcomes for the greatest number of patients. 2. Balancing Benefits and Harms: Consequentialists weigh the benefits and harms of an action. In this case, the potential lethal infection is a serious harm, but if the overall benefits (cost reduction, faster healing) significantly outweigh the harms, a consequentialist might argue in favor of nondisclosure to avoid hindering widespread access to the medical device. 3. Risk Management: Consequentialists might consider the risk of harm in relation to the likelihood and severity of the harm. If the percentage of patients experiencing the lethal infection is small and the benefits are substantial, a consequentialist might prioritize the overall positive impact. 4. Consequences as Primary: Unlike deontology, consequentialism places consequences at the forefront of ethical considerations. The potential negative repercussions for the sales representative, such as violating the NDA, would be weighed against the potential harm caused by nondisclosure. In summary, while a deontologist would likely emphasize the duty to disclose information and prioritize ethical principles, a consequentialist might weigh the overall balance of good and bad consequences and might justify nondisclosure if the benefits significantly outweigh the harms. These perspectives highlight the different ethical considerations and priorities inherent in deontological and consequentialist approaches to moral decision-making. C. Identify and explain which level of cognitive moral development (i.e., preconventional, conventional, or postconventional) is represented in the scenario for each of the following questions: Which action would most likely serve the greater good in society? Postconventional Level (Stage 5 - Social Contract and Individual Rights): At this level, individuals recognize the importance of social contracts and individual rights. Choosing an action that serves the greater good in society aligns with a postconventional moral development perspective. Here, the emphasis is on societal benefit and ethical principles beyond personal gain or adherence to rules. If I reveal this information, will I get into trouble and possibly even lose my job? Conventional Level (Stage 3 - Interpersonal Relationships): This question reflects a concern for maintaining interpersonal relationships and avoiding personal harm. In the conventional level, individuals tend to make decisions based on societal expectations and norms. Fear of getting into trouble or losing one's job is characteristic of the conventional level as it revolves around social approval and maintaining order. Which action best aligns with my long-held belief in the principle of justice? Postconventional Level (Stage 6 - Universal Principles): The consideration of long-held beliefs in the principle of justice aligns with the postconventional level. At this stage, individuals develop their moral principles based on universal ethical values, and decisions are guided by a sense of duty to uphold these principles, even if they conflict with societal norms. What do the laws say, and what would a law-abiding citizen do?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help