7-1 Journal- Information Sharing(CJ310)

.docx

School

Southern New Hampshire University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

CJ 310

Subject

Computer Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by Arielpenton on coursehero.com

7-1 Journal: Information Sharing 7-1 Journal: Information Sharing Ariel Penton Southern New Hampshire University CJ 310- Intro to Homeland Security/ Counterterrorsim Professor: Christopher L. Elg, M.P.A. October 15, 2023 1
7-1 Journal: Information Sharing Prior to the tragic events of 9/11, government agencies had a different attitude toward sharing information compared to present day. The approach to information sharing was characterized by a complex web of issues, which impeded effective cooperation and coordination among agencies. Government agencies often kept information to themselves. They were protective with their intelligence and data, often driven by concerns about jurisdiction, budget allocation, and a lack of standardized protocols for information sharing. This culture of compartmentalization was prominent within agencies such as the CIA, FBI, and NSA, which held critical counterterrorism information but were reluctant to share it with other agencies. Information gathered at the local level was hindered by the lack of clear channels for dissemination to higher government levels. Local law enforcement agencies collected valuable intelligence but faced obstacles when trying to share this information with state and federal agencies. These hurdles included issues related to communication platforms, data classification, and a lack of resources for data sharing. Information collected at the federal level was similarly challenged in terms of sharing with state and local agencies. Federal agencies like the FBI and CIA were often reluctant to disseminate sensitive intelligence to local authorities. This lack of cooperation hindered efforts to combat terrorism effectively, as local law enforcement agencies could not leverage the valuable resources available at the federal level. In the aftermath of 9/11, there were significant reforms aimed at improving information sharing. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the establishment of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) played pivotal roles in enhancing inter-agency coordination and intelligence sharing. These entities acted as intermediaries, breaking down barriers that had hindered effective counterterrorism efforts. The 9/11 Commission Report prompted legal and structural changes that fostered a greater willingness to share intelligence among agencies, as the collective imperative for national security took precedence over internal divisions. The implementation of initiatives like the "fusion centers" at the state and local levels facilitated the flow of information from the state to federal agencies. Additionally, the development of standardized communication systems and protocols improved the speed and accuracy of information sharing. Collaboration became more streamlined, enabling agencies to work together with a common purpose to prevent terrorist activities. In conclusion, the government's attitude toward information sharing has transformed significantly since the events of 9/11. The tragedy exposed the inherent weaknesses in the pre-9/11 approach, which was marked by a lack of collaboration and coordination. Post-9/11, reforms and initiatives have fostered a more open, integrated, and effective system of information sharing among government agencies, leading to improved counterterrorism efforts and enhancing national security. 2
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help