Select Search
World Factbook
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
The Period of the French Revolution
>
Southey
> Erasmus Darwin;
The Botanic Garden; The Loves of the Plants
John Hall Stevenson;
Crazy Tales
William Hayley;
The Triumph of Temper
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume XI. The Period of the French Revolution.
VIII.
Southey
.
§ 21. Erasmus Darwin;
The Botanic Garden; The Loves of the Plants
.
Who now reads Erasmus Darwin? Yet he pleased both Horace Walpole and William Cowper, his verses were called by the latter strong, learned and sweet, and by the former sublime, charming, enchanting, gorgeous, beautiful and most poetic. It is idle to assign Darwins poetic extinction to Cannings parody, admirable as that is, for, if there is one critical axiom universally endorsed by good critics of all ages, schools and principles, it is that parody cannot killthat it cannot even harmanything that has not the seeds of death and decay in itself. The fact is that Darwin, with a fatal, and, as if metaphysically aided, certainty, evolved from the eighteenth century couplet poetry all its worst features, and set them in so glaring a light that only those still under the actual spell could fail to perceive their deformity. Unsuitableness of subject; rhetorical extravagance and, at the same time, convention of phrase; otiose and padding epithet; monotonously cadenced verse; every fault of the mere imitators of Pope in poetry, Darwin mustered in
The Botanic Garden,
and especially in its constituent
The Loves of the Plants.
It is true, but it is also vain, to say that the subject, in itself, is interesting and positively valuable; that the rhe oric, the phraseology, the effort, are all very craftsmanlike examples of crafts bad in themselves. The very merits of the effort are faults as and where they are; and it has none of the faults which, in true poetry, are not seldom merits. Although one would not lose
The Loves of the Triangles
for anything, it is superfluous as a mere parody.
The Loves of the Plants
is a parody in itself and of itself, as well as of the whole school of verse which it crowned and crushed. Time is not likely to destroy, and may rather increase, the credit due to Darwins scientific pioneership: its whirligig is never likely to restore the faintest genuine taste for his pseudo-poetry.
35
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
John Hall Stevenson;
Crazy Tales
William Hayley;
The Triumph of Temper
Loading
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Shakespeare
·
Bible
·
Saints
·
Anatomy
·
Harvard Classics
·
Lit. History
·
Quotations
·
Poetry
©
19932013
Bartleby.com
· [
Top 150
]