Select Search
World Factbook
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
The Age of Dryden
>
The Early Quakers
> Early Attacks upon the Quakers, and their Replies
James Nayler
Samuel Fisher
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume VIII. The Age of Dryden.
IV.
The Early Quakers
.
§ 9. Early Attacks upon the Quakers, and their Replies.
The early quakers, like most Christian mystics, had no thought of setting themselves in opposition to fundamental orthodoxy as they understood it. But, inevitably, their constant appeal to the Light Within, and their consequent refusal to bow down to outward authority, brought them into fierce conflict with the religious teachers of their day, by most of whom the Bible had been erected into the final and only rule of faith and practice. And so, as they were compelled to defend themselves against attacks which condemned them, with indiscriminate violence as papists, heretics, atheists and blasphemers, the purpose of their writings became more and more directly theological. On both sides, it is to be feared,abuse counted for more than argument, and the oblivion into which these reams of printed matter have fallen cannot be said to have been undeserved.
24
So early as 1656, John Bunyan attacked the quakers, without explicitly naming them, in
Some Gospel Truths Opened,
and was answered by Edward Burrough and George Fox. Thomas Hicks, the baptist, roused the wrath of Ellwood by his
Dialogue between a Christian and a Quaker;
and Richard Baxter, in his
Quakers Catechism,
complaining of their violent and railing language, denounced them as abominable infidels, Pagans and a generation of the Devil. In kindlier vein, Henry More the Cambridge Platonist, while admitting as safe and reasonable the principle of the light within a man, expressed his sorrow at their uncouth and ridiculous opinions, and was sorely grieved when his friend the learned and philosophical viscountess Conway (daughter of speaker Finch) joined herself to what he described as the most melancholy sect that ever was in the world. To all these, and many more, the quakers issued voluminous replies.
7
25
Note 7
. In vol.
I
of E. Arbers
Term Catalogues,
the titles are given of 44 books written against the quakers between the years 1671 and 1680. Joseph Smiths
Bibliotheca Anti-Quakeriana
(1873), contains an alphabetical catalogue of many hundreds of these writings. George Foxs
The Great Mystery
(1659) has replies to over one hundred attacks on the quakers.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
James Nayler
Samuel Fisher
Loading
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Shakespeare
·
Bible
·
Saints
·
Anatomy
·
Harvard Classics
·
Lit. History
·
Quotations
·
Poetry
©
19932013
Bartleby.com
· [
Top 150
]