Select Search
World Factbook
Roget's Int'l Thesaurus
Bartlett's Quotations
Respectfully Quoted
Fowler's King's English
Strunk's Style
Mencken's Language
Cambridge History
The King James Bible
Oxford Shakespeare
Gray's Anatomy
Farmer's Cookbook
Post's Etiquette
Brewer's Phrase & Fable
Bulfinch's Mythology
Frazer's Golden Bough
All Verse
Anthologies
Dickinson, E.
Eliot, T.S.
Frost, R.
Hopkins, G.M.
Keats, J.
Lawrence, D.H.
Masters, E.L.
Sandburg, C.
Sassoon, S.
Whitman, W.
Wordsworth, W.
Yeats, W.B.
All Nonfiction
Harvard Classics
American Essays
Einstein's Relativity
Grant, U.S.
Roosevelt, T.
Wells's History
Presidential Inaugurals
All Fiction
Shelf of Fiction
Ghost Stories
Short Stories
Shaw, G.B.
Stein, G.
Stevenson, R.L.
Wells, H.G.
Reference
>
Cambridge History
>
Renascence and Reformation
>
The Language from Chaucer to Shakespeare
> Elizabethan English
Fifteenth century changes in vocabulary
Growing importance of the vernacular
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes
(190721).
Volume III. Renascence and Reformation.
XX.
The Language from Chaucer to Shakespeare
.
§ 2. Elizabethan English.
Of changes in pronunciation during the fifteenth century, those of open and close ē and ō, are, perhaps, the most important. The open and close values had, apparently, been distinct in Chaucers time, for he avoids riming the one with the other; but, in the fifteenth century, the open values began to approximate those of the close. This change gave to open ō what is practically its modern value, but the other sounds were to undergo further changes in the sixteenth and later centuries.
8
At the same time, medial
gh
ceased to be pronounced. Chaucer does not rime a vowel followed by
ght
with a vowel followed by
t;
but, in Lydgate, fought rimes with about, and there is ample evidence that the Old English sound of medial
h
was, by this time, lost.
11
The orthography during this century was somewhat confused. It was irregular in the sixteenth century, in spite of the influence of printed texts, but already it was assuming forms which, with slight changes, were destined to survive all later modifications of pronunciation, thus producing the anomalies of our modern spelling. After Caxtons day, old symbols like [char] and
p
were discarded, and final non-syllabic -
e
was often used, as in stone (nom.), without any etymological warrant: its use, in such cases, being due to analogy with the oblique forms in which it normally occurred.
12
Note 8
. These changes might, roughly, be indicated as follows:
M. E.
Example
14th
cent. pronunciation
15th
cent. pronunciation
open ē mele (meal) sounded as in Pair sounded as in Pail close ē demen (deem) sounded as in Pail sounded as in Pail open ō stoon (stone) sounded as in Paul sounded as in Paul, Pole close ō doom (doom) sounded as in Pole sounded as in Pole.
[
back
]
CONTENTS
·
VOLUME CONTENTS
·
INDEX OF ALL CHAPTERS
·
BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Fifteenth century changes in vocabulary
Growing importance of the vernacular
Loading
Click
here
to shop the
Bartleby Bookstore
.
Shakespeare
·
Bible
·
Saints
·
Anatomy
·
Harvard Classics
·
Lit. History
·
Quotations
·
Poetry
©
19932013
Bartleby.com
· [
Top 150
]