Is it possible for a single MAC address to be used by more than one network interface at the same time? Is there a justification for this action? Is it possible to utilise the same Internet Protocol address (IP address) for two different network interfaces? What explanations have you come up with for why this is the case?

Is it possible for a single MAC address to be used by more than one network interface at the same time? Is there a justification for this action? Is it possible to utilise the same Internet Protocol address (IP address) for two different network interfaces? What explanations have you come up with for why this is the case?

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter13: Internet And Distributed Application Services

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10RQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There is a chance that media access control (MAC) addresses will be used for more than one network interface all at once. Why have you come to the conclusion that you should not go through with it? Is there a correlation between the usage of many network interfaces and an increase in the likelihood of IP address collisions? Is there a purpose or meaning to the activity that's being conducted right now?
Is it even somewhat possible for two distinct network interfaces to have the same MAC address? Is there a purpose or meaning to the activity that's being conducted right now? Is it possible to use the same Internet Protocol address on two separate network interfaces at the same time, and if so, is it realistic to do so? Is there a purpose or meaning to the activity that's being conducted right now?
Can a MAC address be shared by several network interfaces? So why is this happening, or why isn't it? If one network interface may use another's IP address, can the inverse also be true? To what end, or why not, do you suppose this is happening?
What is the rationale behind the requirement for a private network address? Is it possible for a datagram containing a private network address to be transmitted over the public Internet in its entirety? Explain?
MAC addresses may be reused on many network interfaces. When given the opportunity, why are you rejecting it? Is there a higher chance of IP address conflicts when utilizing several network interfaces? Does this behavior have any legitimacy at all?
Whether or not it's possible for two different network interfaces to share a MAC address. Is there a purpose behind this decision? Can two interfaces on the same network share the same IP address? Is there any sense behind this decision?How does it function when data is cached in an entirely associative format?
Is it actually the case that MAC addresses are where packet routing takes place when it comes to routers? Then could you please explain how it operates, and if you said no, could you please describe the apparatus that would be required to do the task, as well as how it operates?
Could two or more network interfaces share the same Media Access Control (MAC) address? Or not? Is sharing an IP address between many network interfaces possible? Or not?
Why is a private network address required for you? Is it feasible that in the future, a datagram with an address from a private network may end up being accessible over the whole public Internet? Explain.
Some application programs can take advantage of the services provided by two transport-layer protocols (UDP or TCP). So, how is it possible for a computer to determine which transport layer is involved when a packet arrives at its destination?
The benefits and drawbacks of connectionless protocols must be weighed against those of connection-based ones.
The industry currently favors connection-based protocols, so please provide a succinct explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of connectionless protocols.