Imagine that firm X chooses their quantity first, then firm Y observes the quantity of firm X and chooses their own quantity. What is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium? Is there a first or second-mover advantage here? You don't need to draw the whole game tree but you should give some kind of explanation for how you came to this equilibrium.

Imagine that firm X chooses their quantity first, then firm Y observes the quantity of firm X and chooses their own quantity. What is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium? Is there a first or second-mover advantage here? You don't need to draw the whole game tree but you should give some kind of explanation for how you came to this equilibrium.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter15: Strategic Games

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

#3. Characterize the unique subgame-perfect equilibrium in the following game. Can you find any Nash equilibrium which is not subgame perfect? Explain. D R D (1,1,1)) R D N-1 N-1' N-1' D **** N-1 R D R (2,2,..., 2)
Consider the following extensive form of the game. The outcome in the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of this game is ( Select] It would not pay for the incumbent to produce the large quantity if its profits from producing large quantity is less than $ ( Select ] Enter (50,50) Rival Small •(100,0) Don't enter Incumbent Large - (60,0)
A large group of players each guesses a number between 0 and 300. The winner is the person whose number is closest to three-fifth of the average guess. What is the Nash equilibrium? Will it be observed? What do you expect for the outcome of this game with next year's 203 class? (Considering that they have similar sophistication to your class but they have not covered game theory yet.)
We can see from the payoff matrix that there are no pure strategy Nash equilibrium in this game because at least one firm would always have an incentive to change its behavior. From Nash's theorem, we know there must be at least one Nash equilibrium so there must be a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. Find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium by first deleting all dominated strategies in the game What's the expected payoff to Firm 1 in the equilibrium?
Consider two ice cream sellers competing at a beach that is 1000 metres long. Ice cream prices are fixed by the ice cream company, but companies can choose their locations simultaneously. Customers are located uniformly (spread out evenly on the beach) and do not like walking. The cost of walking every metre is the same (i.e. linear cost). a) Suppose there are three ice cream sellers that locate simultaneously. Find the Nash equilibrium is there is one. Else, explain why there is none. (Focus on pure strategy Nash equilibria)
Player 2 X Y Player X (3,3) (0,4) 1 Y (4,0) (2,2) Figure 9.18 Find all the subgame perfect Nash equilibria of this supergame. Also, briefly explain why each one is subgame perfect.
Consider the following game: PLAYER 2 Left Middle Right Up 0,0 2,5 5.4 PLAYER 1 Middle 1,2 7,3 4,3 Down 5,5 3, 1 2, 1 Which of the following statements is true? There are two Nash equilibria, and they are both Pareto efficient. There is a unique Nash equilibrium. There are two Nash equilibria, and they are both Pareto inefficient. There are two Nash equilibria, but only one is Pareto efficient. None of these.
Exercise 6.7. Suppose two identical companies produce wood stoves and they are the only ones on the market. Its costs are given by: C1 (q1 )=200q1 and C2 (q2) = 200q2. And the inverse market demand curve is: P=2000-2Q, where Q =q1 + q2 Get the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Calculate the profits of each company. Show graphically. Suppose that the two companies form a cartel to maximize joint profits. How many stoves will you produce? Calculate the profits of each company. Represent graphically. Managers now note that explicit agreements to collude are illegal. Each company must decide on its own whether to produce the amount of Cournot or that of the cartel.
The world has changed a bit. Microsoft and Google could still either cooperate or compete in the market for social media video software currently captured by Tik Tok, but their payoffs have changed. The table below shows their profits in billions of USD in each scenario. Use your mouse to point and click on the Nash equilibrium outcome(s). [There may be more than one so make sure you work out all the best response strategies]. Microsoft Cooperate 3,3 4,0 Cooperate O Don't cooperate O Google Don't cooperate O O 0,4 1,1
2. Consider the following "location game." There are two ice cream sellers (Seller 1 and Seller 2) in a small city. Residents are uniformly located on a straight street of length 1. The ice cream sellers need to choose where to set up their carts, and each resident will purchase one unit of ice cream from the nearest seller. The city council has fixed the price of the ice cream, and as a result, each seller just wants sell as much ice cream as possible. (a) We think of this "location game" as a simultaneous-move game, in which each player's payoff is the proportion of residents that buy from her cart. Is this game with discrete strategies or continuous strategies? Please state the set of (pure) strategies for both sellers. Is this game zero-sum or non-zero-sum? (b) Find all NE(s) of this game. (c) Is there an alternative pair of locations for the sellers such that the residents’ total walking distance is reduced but neither seller is hurt? Is it an NE? (d) Suppose now that there are…
2. Consider the following "location game." There are two ice cream sellers (Seller 1 and Seller 2) in a small city. Residents are uniformly located on a straight street of length 1. The ice cream sellers need to choose where to set up their carts, and each resident will purchase one unit of ice cream from the nearest seller. The city council has fixed the price of the ice cream, and as a result, each seller just wants sell as much ice cream as possible. (a) We think of this "location game" as a simultaneous-move game, in which each player's payoff is the proportion of residents that buy from her cart. Is this game with discrete strategies or continuous strategies? Please state the set of (pure) strategies for both sellers. Is this game zero-sum or non-zero-sum? (b) Find all NE(s) of this game.
For the questions that ask you to draw the games, you can either draw them on the computer, or draw them by hand and then insert a picture. The table function in word works well for drawing these games, and was what I used. Part 1: Dominant and dominated strategies In the following games, identify any dominant or dominated strategies. Specify whether the strategy is strictly or weakly dominant/dominated. Then use dominant and/or dominated strategies to provide the solution to the game. Player 2 Player 1 Left Right Up 4, 1 2, 4 Down 1, 2 3, 3 Player 2 Player 1 Left Center Right Up 7, 3 8, 6 4, 9 Middle 1, 8 5, 7 3, 4 Down 2, 1 9, 5 6, 2 Player 2 Player 1 Left Center Right Up 2, 1 3, 6 7, 5 Middle 0, 8 7, 7 3, 5 Down 2, 2 4, 1 3, 1 Assume there is some deadly airborne disease. Assume that…