3. As supervisor of a facilities engineering department, you consider mobile cranes to be criticalequipment. The purchase of a new, medium-sized truck-mounted crane is being evaluated. Theeconomic estimates for the two best alternatives are shown in the following table. MARR is at15% per year. You can use the assumption of repeatability in this case.AlternativeBACapital investment $272.000 $346.000Annual expensesUseful life (years)| Salvage value28.80019,3006.25,00040.000Show that the same selection is made for the following methods:b. AWC method

AWC is in this we find out the annual cost of each method which includes all cost and select the…

equipment. The purchase of a new, medium-sized truck-mounted crane is economic estimates for the two best alternatives are shown in the following 15% per year. You can use the assumption of repeatability in this case. Alternative A Capital investment $272.000 $346.000 Annual expenses Useful life (years) Salvage value 28.800 19,300 25.000 40.000 Show that the same selection is made for the following methods: D. AWC method

equipment. The purchase of a new, medium-sized truck-mounted crane is economic estimates for the two best alternatives are shown in the following 15% per year. You can use the assumption of repeatability in this case. Alternative A Capital investment $272.000 $346.000 Annual expenses Useful life (years) Salvage value 28.800 19,300 25.000 40.000 Show that the same selection is made for the following methods: D. AWC method

Survey of Accounting (Accounting I)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305961883

Author:Carl Warren

Publisher:Carl Warren

Chapter15: Capital Investment Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.15E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A warehouse manager is evaluating 2 different robotic systems to be installed in his warehouse. Using the present worth analysis, determine which is the economically better system if MARR is 12% per year compounded monthly. Justify your answer. System A System B - 40,000 -60,000 - 5,000 Initial cost, RM Maintenance cost, RM per month Semi-annual maintenance cost, RM per 6-month Salvage value after 5 years, RM - 13,000 8,000 10,000
Two mutually exclusive investment alternatives for implementing an office automation plan in an engineering design firm are being considered. If the firm's MARR is 10% per year, which alternative should be selected? Compare the alternatives shown below on the basis of Incremental Analysis. Investment A Investment B Capital Investment, $ 920,000 660,000 Annual Expenses, S/ yr. 167,000 133,000 Salvage value, $ 410,000 330,000 Life, years 10 10 What is the Incremental NPV at 7%? (Round off the final answer to whole number value) What is the Incremental NPV at 13%? (Round off the final answer to whole number value)
Two mutually exclusive investment altematives for implementing an office automation plan in an engineering design firm are being considered. If the firm's MARR is 10% per year, which alternative should be selected? Compare the alternatives shown below on the basis of Incremental Analysis. Investment A Investment B Capital Investment, S Annual Expenses, S/yr. 920,000 660,000 167,000 133,000 Salvage value, S 410,000 330,000 Life, years 10 10 Determine IRR on incremental analysis, using 7% and 13% rates. Oa86% Ob 11.1% 10.9% Od.95%
The engineers in a manufacturing company have proposed an investment of a newconcrete batching plant to improve the quality of their products. The estimates areshown in Table 2. The minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) of the companyper year is 15%. Table 2: Estimates of New Concrete Batching PlantEstimatesInitial investment $250,000Salvage value $50,000Annual operating cost $35,000Annual revenues $90,000Study period 10 years a. Calculate the equivalent annual worth (AW) of the given investment.b. What annual revenue should be attained to reach breakeven.
Two mutually exclusive investment altematives for implementing an office automation plan in an engineering design firm are being considered. If the firm's MARR is 10% per year, which alternative should be selected? Compare the altematives shown below on the basis of Incremental Analysis. Investment A Investment B Capital Investment, S 920,000 660,000 Annual Expenses, S/ yr. 167,000 133,000 Salvage value, S 410,000 330,000 Life, years 10 10 Determine IRR on incremental analysis, using 7% and 13% rates. Oa.86% Ob 11.1% 10.9% Od.95%
Find the expected EUAW from the financial data provided in the table for new equipment. Because of the uncertainty of technology being used in this equipment, it has not been possible to get the initial cost accurately. The annual benefit, however, is estimated to be $25,000 with a possible equipment life of 5 years. The salvage value is expected to be 10% of the initial cost. MARR = 8%. First Cost, $ $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 Probability 0.25 0.35 0.30 0.10 Choices: A. $3957 B. $2977 C. $4628 D. $5157 Determine the associated risk measure in this equipment investmest in terms of standard deviation. A. $6,123 B. $4437.80 C. $8,523 D. $4,923
A manufacturing company is trying to decide between the two machines shown below. Determine which machine should be selected on the basis of rate of return. Assume the MARR is 20% per year. Machine A Machine B Initial Cost, $ -18,000 -35,000 Annual operating cost, $/year -4,000 -3,600 Salvage value, $ 1,000 2,700 Life, years 3 6
You have been asked to evaluate two alternatives, X and Y, that may increase plant capacity for manufacturing high-pressure hydraulic hoses. The parameters associated with each alternative have been estimated. Which one should be selected on the basis of a present worth comparison at an interest rate of 13% per year? Why is yours the correct choice? Alternative First Cost X $-45,000 Maintenance cost, per $-9000 Year Salvage Value $1,000 Life 5 years Y $-55,000 $-4000 $6,500 5 years The present worth of alternative X is $ 13888 and that of alternative Y is $ 44459.4 Alternative X is selected by the company.
Emerson Electric manufactures compressors for air conditioners. It needs replacement equipment to improve one of its manufacturing lines. Select between two options using the MARR of 14% per year and a future worth analysis for the expected use period. What are the future values of each option? Option First cost, S A B -64,000-76,000 -16,000-22,000 AOC, $ per year Expected salvage value 8,000 11,000 Expected use, years 3 6
A manufacturer of automated optical inspection devices is deciding on a project to increase the productivity of the manufacturing processes. The estimated costs for the two feasible alternatives being compared are shown below. Use the internal rate of return (IRR) method to determine which alternative should be selected if the analysis period is 8 years and the company's MARR is 4% per year. Alternative M N Initial costs $30,000 $45,000 Net annual cash flow $4,500 $7,000 Life in years 8 8 (a) IRR of base alternative = (b) IRR of incremental cash flow = (c) Choose Alternative
EconomicS 2. Referring to the given data in 6.7/317 at the end of Chapter 6 (Engineering Economy by Sullivan et al), select the best alternative using: (a) PW (b) AW © FW (d) IRR 6-7. Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given next. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. A в $28,000 $55,000 $40,000 Annual expenses $15,000 $13,000 $22,000 Annual revenues $23,000 $28,000 $32,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 Investment cost Market value Useful life 10 years 10 years 10 years 26.4% 24.7% 22.4% IRR A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. (6.4)
The production department is proposing the purchase of an automatic insertion machine. It has identified 3 machines, each with an estimated life of 10 years. Which machine offers the best internal rate of return? Annual net cash flows Average investment Machine A only Machine B only Machine C only O Machines A and B Machine A $ 50,000 250,000 Machine B $ 40,000 300,000 Machine $ 75,000 500,000