A. Since the p-value is large, there is a significant difference. B. Since the p-value is large, there is not a significant difference. C. Since the p-value is small, there is a significant difference. D. Since the p-value is small, there is not a significant difference. Part 2 What do you conclude about the home field advantage? (Use the level of significance α=0.05.) A. The advantage appears to be higher for soccer.
When games were sampled throughout a season, it was found that the home team won 113 of 163 soccer games, and the home team won 61 of 94 field hockey games. The result from testing the claim of equal proportions are shown on the right. Does there appear to be a significant difference between the proportions of home wins? What do you conclude about the home field advantage?
2-proportion test p1≠p2
z
=
0.73175372
p-value
=
0.46431890
p1
=
0.6932515337
p2
=
0.6489361702
p
=
0.6770428016
Question content area bottom
Part 1
Does there appear to be a significant difference between the proportions of home wins? (Use the level of significance α=0.05.)
A.
Since the p-value is large, there is a significant difference.
B.
Since the p-value is large, there is not a significant difference.
C.
Since the p-value is small, there is a significant difference.
D.
Since the p-value is small, there is not a significant difference.
Part 2
What do you conclude about the home field advantage? (Use the level of significance α=0.05.)
A.
The advantage appears to be higher for soccer.
B.
The advantage appears to be higher for field hockey.
C.
The advantage appears to be about the same for soccer and field hockey.
D.
No conclusion can be drawn from the given information.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
