Fracking is a big part in today’s world and some people don’t like the idea of it, because it can be harmful to the earth. With fracking it has supplied the world with enough energy to continue for about 100 years. Natural gas has supplied the world since “the French explorers discovered it in 1626” (Brief history), 0but didn’t start fracking till the 19th century. With fracking being all around the country it offers great, good paying jobs. Natural gas from fracking is more affordable than other energy sources in abundant amounts. Chemicals used in fracking is said to contaminate earth’s water source if comes into contact and cannot be filtered clean. Natural gas has supplied energy to humanity since the 19th century, offers great since jobs …show more content…
Since 19th century fracking, coal, and other fossil fuels have supplied humanity with energy. With fracking In 2000, shale beds provided “just 1% of America’s natural gas, but now they provide 25%” (fracking good idea?)of America’s natural gas. Fracking has a big part in our world with supplying the world with energy. In just Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York, and Texas the amount of natural gas in the ground is enough energy to power the country for 110 years.
Many people believe that gas and oil are found in huge subterranean caverns. Non-Renewable fossil fuels “supply Australia by more than 95% of their energy needed” (non-renewable energy). With an abundance amount of fossil fuels in the ground that means gas companies will need people to get it out therefore, a great deal of jobs will be
…show more content…
As this fluid holds the “underground fissures open, oil and gas flow up the well to the surface where they can be recovered”(good idea?). When fracking, companies use up to 8 million liters of water, that is the daily consumption of 65,000 people and uses several thousand tons of sand. Congressional Democrat reported in April they identified about 750 chemicals that were used to frack and 29 of them are carcinogens. It is said by “fracking explained” that companies use up to 2,000 liters of chemicals. The chemicals compress the water, kill Bacteria, or dissolve minerals, but they also infect everyday water that can't be filtered clean. Also a variable amount of fracking fluid remains in the ground after a well has run dry and the “EPA has recently targeted this pollution and plans to set strict guidelines to reduce it” (good idea?). Even though fracking has some cons it also has tons of pros.
Natural gas has supplied energy to humanity since the 19th century, it offers great jobs, and is more affordable than other energy sources. Without fossil fuels/natural gas it would harder and more expensive to have everyday energy. With fracking being a big part in today’s world, people still wonder if the chemicals used are really dangerous and if there is another way to make them more earth
Fracking is a pressurized, chemically treated mixture of water and sand used to release and extract natural gas and petroleum from shale rock. The process involves a well drilled vertically to the desired depth, then turns ninety degrees and continues horizontally for thousands of feet into the shale believed to contain the trapped natural gas. A mix of water, sand, and various chemicals are pumped into the well at high pressure in order to create fissures in the shale through which the gas can escape. Natural gas escapes through the fissures and is drawn back up the well to the surface, where it is processed, refined, and shipped to market. Flowback returns to the surface after the fracking process is completed (Fracking: The Process 1). Environmentalist want the technique of fracking banned because it plays a part in global warming, affects our water, and causes human health problems. If fracking cannot be banned because of its necessity, then it should be made safe and eco-friendly.
Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is the process of extracting natural gas from shale rock layers deep within the earth.The dangers of fracking are the chemicals that go into fracking and how much water is used and contamination of city water. Some dangers of fracking are water usage. They use 2 to 5 million gallons of water. Not all of the chemicals are recovered from the ground. We only know of 8 out of 600 chemicals. To many chemicals are used and some a harmful. Fracking water usage is too high for instance one well can use 144,000,000million gallons of water. 50%-70% of the fracking fluid is left in the ground and isn’t biodegradable. The waste fluid that is outside in the sunlight evaporates and releases volatile organic compounds(Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are organic chemicals that have a high vapor pressure at ordinary room temperature. Their high vapor pressure results from a low boiling point, which causes large numbers of molecules to evaporate or sublimate from the liquid or solid form of the compound and enter the surrounding air.) Due to the VOCs acid rain, ground level ozone and contaminated air. Ground level ozone is bad, but ozone up high in the atmosphere protects the earth from the Sun’s harmful rays.
This article tries to advocate fracking by giving insights on how safe fracking is for the environment. To begin with, a brief description is given as to how fracking is done to extract natural gas. Views of Manhattan Institute senior fellow Robert Bryce which compare the CO2 emissions in 2002 and 2012 show a drop of 8% due to surge in shale gas production, which reduced coal usage. Water usage and other resources like land and habitat protection for wild animals has been presented in the article to highlight how fracking is much environment friendly compared to other energy sources, even wind and solar.
Many people do not know where and how most of their energy is being produced. A well as how those people who have near hydraulic Fracking are affected by it and the eco system that they live in. Which is why the people need to act and find a much more safe way of getting natural gases without getting water supplies infected with chemicals that can cause life changing effect to the people's health.
Fracking has actually changed out future as we know it, and has made it possible for many things. Fracking will make the world run on natural fossil fuels for much longer, which is also better for the environment and us. In 2015, the U.S. reached its all time high in oil production in 14 years and is only expected to continually rise. Oil production in the U.S. is one of the main sources of jobs for people living in the U.S. (Nunez, 2013). Fracking is a good way to employ U.S. citizens and is also a good way to get natural ways of oil production. As we all
Some people believe fracking is good for mankind, but it is in fact good for modern technology and terrible for the environment that man lives in. Fracking provides us with oil and natural gas. The process of fracking is to drill into the earth and pump water and other chemicals into the earth to create cracks or fissure in the shale rock, allowing the gases to be released into a well for collection. The chemicals used in fracking can include water, sand, salt, citric acid, benzene or lead, which can be dangerous if not isolated and used properly. If these chemicals were to leak out in the public they would cause serious health problems and even death. If human life isn’t a good enough reason to end fracking then I don’t know what is. (bib 1, 2, 3)
Natural gas is being relied upon more as an energy source instead of the polluting energy source of burning coal. This is a good thing because it is cutting out the CO2 emissions given off by using coal. However, the method of using hydraulic fracturing to get the natural gas is worse for the environment than the coal. But in the long run, the benefits of hydraulic fracturing do not outweigh the costs. Fracking releases methane gas, a greenhouse gas, into the environment. The chemicals that are being used are winding up in our drinking water, and there has been evidence that fracking has increased seismic activity in the regions in which it is being used to extract the natural gas. Using natural gas cuts down the greenhouse gas emissions of coal, but the very method to gather natural gas also increases greenhouse gas emissions. Negating any clean energy benefits that the
Furthermore, one way to prove that fracking is bad is the condition of water near fracking sites. Fracking is notorious for the pollution of well and spring water. Chemical fluids may spill, then they run off into well water. Hydraulic fracking can be dangerous to well water if the hydraulic fluid is mismanaged, and spills. If the hydraulic fluids spill, it then pours out into the people’s well water or spring water, and then pollutes the water. Fracking can also cause a shortage of water. Shale fracking uses a lot of water, and that amount is about 11.5 million liters. The amount of water taken by fracking can leave a town with a limited supply of water. Also, fluid leak off can pour into well water, and the treatment plants can’t do anything
Fourthly, fracking creates real environmental concerns (Lieberman, 2016). Fracking is a process that unearths large amounts of oil and natural gas. “During fracking, a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals are injected into a well at high pressures, fracturing rock far beneath the surface and releasing the gas trapped inside. The gas then flows up toward the surface and out of the head of a well.” One of the causes of concern are due to the huge amounts of water used in the process, which must usually be transported to remote locations. The chemicals used in the process create another area of concern as they could potentially contaminate underground water supplies. To make matters worse, “the fossil fuel industry has been reluctant to
what this is talking about how fracking is good and bad.Toxic substances are in fracking fluid and waste-water as well as air pollution from trucks. equipment and the wells themselves along with an increasing number of CNG fueling stations opening throughout the country.Just as plants do today, those living millions of years ago converted the sun's light energy into food (chemical) energy through the process of photosynthesis. Natural gas is most widely used in the industrial and manufacturing sectors chemicals, metals, glass and food processing,among others with its use to heat and power our nation’s homes and businesses expanding rapidly. have been linked to a variety of negative health effects. although fracking creates jobs for people and
There is wide agreement among experts and the public that the current energy sources we use in the United States are in need of a replacement. The successful development of horizontal drilling by the energy industry coupled with the existing technology of hydraulic fracturing is now providing access to 100 years’ worth of energy in the form of natural gas located within our own borders, thousands of feet below the surface. Fracking is a fairly new method of extracting natural gas and has been very beneficial to our energy needs. The question is not how fracking has helped our goals for cleaner energy, but how fracking has affected our environment, our health and our water.
According to anti fracking people, fracking is destroying our groundwater, and causing air pollution. Natural gas is burned at well sites, “this is considered to be safer than releasing methane into the atmosphere because CO2 is not as potent a greenhouse gas such as methane.”(natural gas and the environment) Even Lisa Jackson the head of the Environmental Agency has seen no proof that fracking has affected drinking water. People who say that fracking causes air pollution, but in reality the gas that is used in fracking is actually safer to use than other gases like benzene. The gas is used for electricity, cooking and heating houses and without it people would be wasting other resources. “Natural gas is flared or burned at well sites.” This
Fracking is often looked down upon by environmental experts, but for what reasons? Is this because fracking uses a lot of water? Or is it because of environment concerns? To get the full story, one needs to dig past some of the exaggerations used by environmentalists to demean the massive industry. Many individuals claim that fracking uses to much water, but it only uses a small percentage of the water used in many other industries. Also, fracking provides massive amounts of the U.S.A’s energy. The process of Hydraulic Fracturing does not use too much water, and is a very efficient way for the U.S.A. to get energy.
While fracking may be harmful to the environment they may also have some beneficial pros toward our economy, such as lower gas prices. However you look at it, burning natural gas is more clean and efficient than other crude energy sources, such as coal. The natural gas industry has seen tremendous growth over the years because it was cheaper and more clean than coal. Natural gas is also easier to store compared to coal because of one feature; it is a gas. Gasses can be compressed unlike solids such as coal, to put into example if you had a truck load of coal and a truck load of compressed natural gas, the natural gas would last longer because there is more of it because it was compressed. While coal is the most abundant fossil fuel in the
Fracking is new method being used to extract natural gases underneath bed rocks by pumping on average eight million liters of water, fracking water consists several thousand pounds of sand and about to two hundred thousand liters of chemicals according to source C. Since this is a new method of extracting natural gases, there's only been very little advance research that has been done among the dangers the environment, wildlife, and humans. This highly new expensive machinery produces greater amounts of fossil fuels that increases the percentages of global warming . Fracking gives a larger exposure to harmful chemicals in bed rocks that lead there way to our clean drinkable water. Though using this new method of extracting natural gases would