There are numerous entities and situations that can be avoided throughout the durations of one’s life, but there are a few things that cannot be escaped being a United States citizen; and that’s taxes and conflict. It’s hard to go a single day without running into some form of conflict, whether it be constructive, or destructive conflict. For me, conflict has always seemed to either go really good, or take a turn for the worst. Over the past few months I’ve attempted to work on some of my strategies to better deal with my day-to-day interpersonal conflicts, so I get in the rhythm of trying to successfully complete an altercation. With that being said, I would like to discuss a conflict that was both relational and organizational. This conflict …show more content…
The initial conflict was started due to an incompatibility of goals by the two parties. Michael wanted to fulfill his work obligation and prioritized that over study hours while the executive board was concerned for obtaining those study hours. Tensions got heated when they confronted him head on after returning home from work, which lead to finger pointing and bickering. The initial conflict interaction ended relatively shortly, but the conflict seemed to push forward over the span of a couple weeks. Evaluating the goals on both sides is crucial to apprehending the communicative process (Berger, 2005). Due to the goals being misconceived, it lead to a standstill. Another important proximal context aspect that directed this conflict was the rules that were at play. Since this conflict was an organizational conflict instead of a social conflict, it created little room for Michael to justify his actions through emotions or other strategies. The organizational goals were not aligned with Michaels prior to the conflict itself, which our textbook would explain that Michael was challenging the rules of the organization through the use of conflict in desire to change the rules and or create new ones (Cupach, Canary & Spitzberg, 2010). It goes without saying, that this conflict did not lead to a successful resolution; but understanding the proximal outcomes and how they shaped the individuals experience is worth noting for future
In Cloke and Goldsmith’s Resolving Conflicts at Work, strategy 1 gives us an overview of conflict today and the many factors that influence. The authors also explain the many ways nearly every conflict can be handled. Cloke tells us that differing human perceptions keep us stuck in conflict longer than is necessary and productive. Early family development sets the default settings for each person’s perception of the situations they will face for the rest of their lives. Cloke goes on to say that conflict is unavoidable especially because today’s media continually subjects Americans to conflict following a common injunction, “if it bleeds it leads.”
How many interpersonal conflicts have you been in today, this week, or even this month? Do you even know which conflict styles you normally use when faced with a disagreement? Furthermore, this analysis shall reflect on my particular conflict styles, with an in-depth look at possible benefits of knowing the conflict styles I tend to incorporate, and how behaviors change based on a relationship and the environment.
When I first met my client, Jackie Hart, she was in the hospital with a broken hip. She lives alone in a senior apartment complex and she has no family. She was transferred to a nursing home for six weeks of rehab after her hip surgery. Jackie was adamant that she was going to return home after her stay in the nursing home. I got Jackie set up with Comfort Keepers so that once she returned home they would provide a bath aide 3x a week, light housekeeping aide 2x a week, and an aide to transport Jackie to the grocery store 1x a week. Comfort Keepers also set Jackie up with a toilet extender, shower seat, and walker. Jackie is to meet with registered dietician Kim Letts to go over proper nutritional needs to help her gain her strength
Conflict Theory is a social and economic factor. It is seen as inequality in gender, race, crime and wealth. Conflict Theory was developed by the theorist Karl Marx, who believed that conflict theory is split into two groups: the wealthy and the poor. Marx labels the wealthy as those who control and the poor are labeled as those who are controlled by the government, law or other authority.
Shockley-Zalabak defines conflict as a “process that occurs when individuals, small groups, or organizations perceive or experience frustration in attaining goals and addressing concerns” (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p. 280). When using this definition the story
As nurses, it is imperative that we have skills to deal with conflict we encounter throughout the day. Some conflicts are easily handled with simple solutions; other disagreements can persist for weeks or even months and never be handled in a proper way to resolve the situation. The later kind of situation can create resentment, anger, and animosity between employees or colleagues. In this paper I will describe a conflict situation with resolution strategies used by the confronter, discuss other ways to resolve the conflict, and discuss the conflict theory most beneficial to use with a diverse group of people.
The reasons for resistance in conflict may be different for each participant involved and unique to any given conflict. Planning the “presentation” with the Chief I have considered that the resistance to this particular conflict is that the “process may not allow for a real exchange of views or permit the real content of the dispute to emerge” (Cloke & Goldsmith, 2011).
Thank you for your contributions to this weeks discussion question. It seems that you and I are very similar in the way we approach conflict. Much like you, I stuggle with the emotional investments tied into personal conflicts, while I find problem solving and conflict resolution in the work place much more easy to approach rationally. Hopefully by the end of this course, you and I will have both found a tactic to help us at home.
Interpersonal Conflict that are presented in the scenario are that Mr. Jones is having a difficult time with a certain student who is in special education. The issue is that Mr. Jones is unable to engage the student when teaching in the classroom. Mr. Jones is trying to find a solution where he can assist the child in becoming engaged academically and behavioral. In addition Ms. Claire, the assistance principal is not in favor of the other team member’s suggestions in resolving the conflict.
“A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger” (Proverbs 15:1, English Standard Version). No two persons are the same. Differences are evident. Personalities collide. Our words can have a positive or negative impact. Conflict can be intrapersonal, interpersonal, or organizational. How are we interacting with our co-workers? How can we as healthcare workers resolve conflict?
Within society people who make less income are less likely to use the internet. The theory that will support my research will be of conflict perspective which focus on the social perspective that holds that stratification is dysfunctional and harmful in society, with inequality perpetuated because it benefits the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor. When the poor goes without the internet it burdens them, to not use the internet. Social systems such as the internet gives people the ability to bring their life chances up to make more income, better their situation, and also helps their children see a better future ahead. The conflict perspective can be used to explain the how inequalities without the can cause damage to a community.
A social issue is defined as a problem that may affect multitudes of people at one time in the social aspect of their life. Interpersonal violence is a wide spread social issue. Interpersonal violence mainly affects women and children. Interpersonal violence, previously known as domestic violence or domestic abuse is the physical, financial, emotional, or sexual abuse by a partner. Interpersonal violence is in every ethnic group, economic class, and community. Women of American Indian decent have the highest risk of being the victim of interpersonal violence (NCADV 1).
Interpersonal conflict is described as “an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent people who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, or interference in the achievement of their goals (Beebe 221). As with many other things, people have developed some myths about it. One of the interpersonal conflict myths is that it indicates a relationship of poor quality. This is, however, incorrect because the conflict can instead demonstrate the complete opposite. An example would be when a couple is arguing about what to eat for dinner. Such a disagreement can show that there is a supportive environment between the two of them. Both people feel comfortable enough to voice their differing opinions without the fear of being negatively
Conflict is inescapable, having the ability to recognize, understand, and resolve conflicts are important in both personal and professional lives. Myatt (2012) states that conflict in the workplace is unavoidable; if left unresolved, workplace conflict may result in loss of productivity and the creation of barriers that can inhibit creativity, cooperation, and collaboration. It is vital to embrace conflict and address problems through effective conflict-resolution tactics because if not handled appropriately, conflict will escalate. “If not handled properly, conflict may significantly affect employee morale, increase turnover, and even result in litigation, ultimately affecting the overall well-being of
In today’s fast paced world, conflict is a frequent occurrence. When people work in groups, there are two quite separate issues involved. The first is the task and the problems involved in getting the job done and the second is the process of the group work itself. A fourth-year conflict transformation class was divided into work teams. Each team which consisted of ten students were to work together to execute and plan what they think the world would be like in thirty years. In other words, the groups common vision of a futuristic world. To their surprise, they were not allowed to work with partners of their choice, but among people they have not yet spoken to throughout the semester. The members of the group were; Brandon, Steve, Justin, Randy, Chris, Molly, Sarah, Jasmine, Christine, and Debbie.