KS_HR Management_Discussion 7--FINAL_Week 7

.docx

School

Indiana University, Purdue University, Indianapolis *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

HR410

Subject

Business

Date

May 16, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ChancellorWren4402 on coursehero.com

Group 2- Katrina Simmons, Marissa Nielsen, Monica Henry, Shweta Jain, James Kendrick, Jeanne Lilly Item 2 TO: Paul Lands, Computer Center FROM: Group 2, Personnel Department RE: Performance Evaluation Mr. Lands, Thank you for informing me of the conflicting information you received regarding yours and Mr. Meena’s performance evaluations. I am sorry to hear you have issues with the performance evaluation you received. At O’Leary Organization we take pride in our work and value our employees. We are committed to adhering to the Uniform Guidelines of Employee Selection Procedures for both the selection and evaluation of employees. As you are aware employee evaluations are just one of the many ways we assess an employee’s performance and rate at which they accomplish their goals (Pynes p.311). As you mentioned, upper management also utilizes these evaluations in order to determine a potential candidate’s future promotion (Pynes p.304). All supervisors must complete the evaluation form and then schedule an interview session with the employee before it is signed by both parties. You both also would have determined common goals for your position. Each supervisor is required to attend training on appraisal form completion and should thoroughly discuss the reasoning behind the scores given. Did you receive your performance evaluation interview? If not, I will make sure to speak with your supervisor and have this scheduled immediately. Based on the comparisons you and Mr. Meena performed, it appears you both may have been victims to common rater errors known as the Horn Effect, Strict/Lenient Rating and Halo Effect (Pynes p. 314). Based on your complaint, my team will begin composing a more detail, oriented appraisal form which will reflect your specific job related features and ranking and have this become the standard each supervisor is required to adhere to. This should leave you with a clearer understanding of the evaluation process. Should you have any further issues or concerns feel free to contact me again. Thank you. Group 2, Personnel Department Item 9 TO: Chris Green, Supervisor FROM: Group 2, Personnel Department RE: Performance Evaluation of Bill Young Mr. Green, Thank you for informing me of your dilemma regarding the performance evaluation of Mr. Young. We want Mr. Young’s evaluation to motivate him to continue to perform to the best of his abilities so we may reward him with a future promotion. This is why each job analysis should be performed based on the Heuristic Guidelines. The Training and Development Team here at
the O’Leary Organization mandates that a 360-degree evaluation be conducted for those in positions such as Mr. Young. Here we will utilize the 360-degree evaluation approach and obtain feedback from his coworkers and clients who are able to observe his standards (Pynes 315). This form of appraisal is a bit more intensive, but will ensure Mr. Young is evaluated at the highest standard. We would also like to implement a self-appraisal method in which the employee will have the opportunity to do a self-evaluation and compare it to the supervisor’s standards in an effort to determine the differences and similarities between the two (Pynes p.316). Hopefully this well rounded process will provide a sufficient analysis of Mr. Young’s overall performance and will result in an accurate overall rating. Please let me know if you have any further issues or concerns. Thank you. Group 2, Personnel Department
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help