Based on the theory of rational ignorance, what should we expect to happen to voter turnout as the internet makes information easier to obtain?
The expectation that will change the voter turnout when the information is available on the internet on the basis of theory of rational ignorance is to be determined.
Answer to Problem 1SCQ
The voter turnout is expected to be on a positive side as the people who are eligible to vote will take interest in casting their vote once the information is easily available on the internet.
Explanation of Solution
The rational ignorance theory is the theory which states that the people who are voting is of the view that their vote is not going to change anything and not even the results of the voting will get affected from their votes. The theory also indicates that the people will get to vote only when there is no cost to acquire the information and when such information is available on internet such people should not to spend much to acquire information and will start taking interest in the elections.
Thus, the above discussion shows that there is an expectation of increase in the voter turnout on the easy availability of information on the internet.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
PRINCIPLES OF MICROECONOMICS (OER)
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Managerial Accounting (5th Edition)
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
Cost Accounting (15th Edition)
Construction Accounting And Financial Management (4th Edition)
Principles of Management
Principles of Accounting Volume 1
- Consider the model of a rational consumer that cares about consumption of private goods and consumption of broadcast public television (a public good). Suppose that the total level of broadcast public television provided through voluntary contributions is 10 hours of programming. Then the government decides to raise money through a tax and provide 10 hours of programming to the public. What would we predict about crowd-out of voluntary contributions to broadcast public television when government does this? How would the answer change if consumers get warm glow utility from donating to broadcast public television in addition to utility from the public television itself? (Be specific.)arrow_forwardAs the Great Depression began in 1929, and millions of Americans found themselves in a terrible economic position, President Herbert Hoover was reluctant to involve the government in directly helping people. This decision helped lead to his loss in the presidential election of 1932. Put yourself in Hoover’s shoes—what reasons would he have for being opposed to large-scale government involvement in the economic lives of Americans? What reasons could be given for the government getting involved?arrow_forwardOne of the most important sources of mortality risk worldwide is traffic accidents. How can the United States reduce the number of traffic accidents per year?arrow_forward
- Which of the following techniques is used by economists to value years of life saved by a highway safety program? Either measuring the increased income that it allows or trying to get those affected by the improved safety to reveal their willingness to pay for the reduced risk of death Trying to get those affected by the improved safety to reveal their willingness to pay for the reduced risk of death none of the other answers is correct, because economists believe that it is impossible to put a value on life Measuring the increased income that it allowsarrow_forwardPeople tend to view car travel as being safer than airplane travel, but a person is how many times more likely to die from a car accident than from an airplane crash?arrow_forwardwhat is the significance of Consumer Preference to government agents?arrow_forward
- what is the theory of public choicearrow_forwardSuppose there are three people in society who vote on whether the government should undertake specific projects. Let the net benefits of a particular project be $150, $140, and $50 for persons A, B, and C, respectively. a. If the project costs $300 and these costs are to be shared equally, would a majority vote to undertake the project? What would be the net benefits to each person under such a scheme? Would total net benefits be positive? b. Suppose the project cost $375 and again costs were to be shared equally. Now would a majority vote for the project and total net benefits be positive? c. Suppose (presumably contrary to fact) votes can be bought and sold in a free market. Describe what kinds of results you might expect in part a and part b.arrow_forwardBN10.3 Case: Your non-profit has just been awarded a special government environmental clean- up grant of $90,000. You are given the choice to take the $90,000 now or wait until next year. With an election coming up, the amount of next year's grant will vary based on which party wins. Assuming that money tomorrow is worth the same as money today, the grant amounts are: Outcome Democrats control everything Republicans control everything Split government Assume: Grant Amount $160,000 $36,100 $90,000 Probability 0.25 0.25 0.50 Assume your Payoff in each case (based on your utility function) is sqrt (grant amount). Question: Do you accept the Money today or wait until next year? Include Calculations of the Expected Value and Expected Utility.arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning