Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid Many believe that college athletes should not be paid. The main debate against compensating college athletes is that they are at the university for educational purposes and playing sports is a benefit. The NCAA states, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (McCauley 10). Universities get all the financial benefits of the money earned from sports played from things such as team jerseys, sports passes and tickets, etc. Many argue that it is only fair to give a portion of the profit to the players that earned the money. It is very important when arguing for or against paying college athletes to not take into fairness, but to hold …show more content…
These amateurs sign a contract forbidding them from receiving any kind of monetary compensation as a college athlete. In short words, they cannot receive any direct funds or sponsorships. The NCAA believes that through scholarships, grants, and financial aid, college athletes are more than able to cover the costs of their tuition, living/traveling expenses (Green 6). Also, playing sports in college leads to future opportunities upon graduation. Essentially, college athletes are paid through scholarships and promotions and in return they represent their school through with their athletic talent. According to Institute for College Access & Success, in the state of Pennsylvania, 71 percent of students leave a public four-year institution or private non-profit four-year institution in debt. The average debt is $32,528 (McCauley 6). That is an enormous burden for kids who may, or may not have a job awaiting them upon graduation. When you look at it that way, plenty of college students would be happy to play a sport for four years if it meant they did not have to take on that financial hardship (McCauley
Many people enjoy college football. Every Saturday during the season, millions of people tune in to watch their favorite college play football. While players of the NFL get paid millions of dollars to play, college players get nothing. Most people say that it’s fair, but others think it's wrong. In my nonfiction article. “Should college football players get paid?” by Michael Gonchar explains that college football players work their butts off and risk injury, their coaches get paid millions of dollars and possibly bonuses, and they leap for joy when they receive little gifts for being in big bowl games.
College students should be able to get paid when they play basketball. College players should get paid. They should get paid, but not that much. If they do nothing except sit on the bench they shouldn’t get paid as much as the players that actually play. You shouldn’t have to pay to get paid. Without a doubt college players should get paid, if they sit on the bench they won’t get paid as much as others, and they shouldn’t pay to get paid.
The crackle of pads and the sounds of whistles. Flags flying everywhere and bodies crashing each other. Football players these days put their bodies and their lives on the line when they go out on the field everyday. This being said, is it time for college athletes to get paid to play. As a result of sports, universities are receiving hundreds of millions of dollars of profit and coaches and staff are getting paid millions, yet the athletes that bring the university and coaches the wins and the success are getting no additional funds. I believe that it is time that student athletes get paid for their contributions to the success that they bring to their universities.
Team sports like soccer or basketball, and additionally individual games are to a great degree well known around the world. Celebrated sportsmen and sportswomen have status like Hollywood superstars, and their wages are high. In any case, regardless of how well they play, every one of them have once been beginners; in this point of view, secondary school or college competitors are very little not quite the same as experts (if also their abilities). In the meantime, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) doesn't allow college competitors to be fiscally adjusted for their effort, which is certainly out of line. College competitors should to be paid their due for various reasons.
A footballer, sweat on his forehead as he sprints thirty yards to the end zone. Two students, legs long and lunging forward as they both gallop for the finish line. A woman gliding on thin air as she slams the ball into the swaying white net. A swimmer, stretching out his arms and legs as he slices through water with the efficiency and speed of a dolphin.
Between busy academic and practice schedules, college athletes are probably some of the most stressed out students. Despite student athletes working more hours than a full-time job and making millions of dollars for the university, they get nothing more than a full scholarship that only meets their most basic needs. The National College Players Association say that 86% of college football players live at or below the national poverty line. Could you imagine going to work for minimum wage while your employer makes hundreds of thousands of dollars off of your name? Because that is precisely what happens to college football players. Many of us grew up going to games and watching our favorite college teams play and never once did we stop to think
As a huge fan of college sports, I admire the total dedication and commitment of a student athletes put towards their respective sport. Because of their effort, college sports is more entertaining than professional sports to watch. Collegiate athletics is a huge business and the revenues add up to some $10.6 billion according to the NCAA. Some have argued that student athletes need to be paid for their work. Are student athletes primarily athletes or students? Should student athletes receive a salary for their participation? Others argue that they are students first like every other academic student on campus and getting paid for voluntary work is unfair. But, their talents bring many billions in revenue and these college athletes don’t see
It’s also important to note that college student-athletes are not only a part of a sports team; they are a part of the college or university’s advertising team. For example, the “Flutie effect” is used to describe a surge in college admission following a big sports win. It’s named for Boston College quarterback Doug Flutie; he won the Heisman Trophy in 1984, and the College’s admissions rose significantly in subsequent years—though the extent of Flutie’s impact has been largely refuted by BC officials since then. Still, colleges and universities use their athletic success to promote their school and entice potential applicants. Student-athletes would be paid for this and all the additional benefits they provide for their
Athletes should not be drafted for professional sports straight out of high school. Instead they should be allowed time before going pro to either attend college, play in a minor league or to further mature into adulthood. After all, every student will excel at differently rates. Even after high school, it is quintessential for students to continue their education. In today’s society, athletes are more than just celebrities they are role models for many of the youth.
Basketball is one of the most followed collegiate level sports. With over 55 million fans that watch the sport on television alone, college basketball’s ad revenue is higher than all other postseason sports. While the NBA postseason only makes around $536 million on ads, over $1 billion is spent on ads during the postseason of college basketball. I, along with several other people, believe that with this amount of money being made on ads alone, colleges would be more than able to pay their players. However, these college basketball heroes end up gaining no money from their games.
When you are in college playing sports you are considered a student athlete, as for if you were a professional you would be a professional athlete. Student athletes in college should not be paid to play because it was like when you played sports in high school it is your choice to play, but if you were a professional you should get paid because you're older and you are at a more complex level and you should be paid because the teams you play for want you and pay for you to come and play for their team. Being a professional is not like being a college athlete because you are an adult and it is your career to play that particular sport. The professionals should be paid because they spend all of their free time working out and practicing when they could be at home laying down, watching movies, eating snacks, and etc. College athletes have their own free time and don’t have to worry about practicing day after day.
Student athletes are getting scholarships and other types of benefits to pay for the education. They get everything they need that is essential to their college experience. They get many things paid for like room and board and books. The average for room and board is around three thousand dollars six thousand dollars per semester which that is already expensive and being paid for by the college/ university. The average books per semester ranged from three hundred to six hundred dollars. Compared to regular students who are not on scholarships or don’t get financial aid. These regular non student athletes have to pull their own money to pay for school and other living and educational expenses in order for them to get a college degree. After that if those students run out of money they have to look for
Although athletes come to play their sports at the next level they are still considered student-athletes if hundreds of thousands of dollars are given away to a lot of just one and done college players who are just using college as a gateway to their professional careers how does this growing thing continue to affect regular students. If continuous money is handed out to athletes then what percentage is left to give to other unfortunate students that are in need and want to receive a valuable education. For athletes getting an education to essentially fall back on is in their best interest, making it to the professional level isn’t promised anything could go wrong. After making the decision to try and it doesn’t work out would leave large amounts of money wasted and the athlete may be stuck without a clue of what to do because they aren’t able to turn back and get their education or continue pursuing their college major.
Central to nearly every discussion about the progress and advancement that the United States has collectively enjoyed has been a question about the value and worth of human labor. Undoubtedly, one for the most resounding truths for the United States has been that the country has managed to find a dominant global status and domestic success due to the contributions of its citizens. Science, education, art, and all other industries have flourished due to the efforts of hundreds of people hailing from different backgrounds. Yet despite this historical precedent establishing the need for valuing the contributions of others, there continues to be a resounding national dismissal
The loud and annoying sounds of an alarm clock go off alerting a student that its 4:37AM. In one fatal swing of the arm the alarm clock goes crashing to the floor in hopes that the sound will stop. After a few minutes of collecting oneself the student gets up and prepares him or herself to go to 6AM practice. After hours of drills, being yelled at, and sweating it is time to sit through numerous classes. Once class is finished it is time to go back to practice, team meeting, lifting, or film session. Don’t forget the homework that is due for class tomorrow. At the day’s end once practice, class, team dinners, and homework are finished it is finally time to go to sleep. This being an almost daily breakdown of a student-athlete has raised much concern for if student-athletes should be paid or not.