Vodacom's Price Strategy High Price Low Price High Price Vodacom +R200 MTN+R200 Vodacom-R100 MTN +R500 Low Price a) Vodacom will charge a low price; MTN will charge a high price. b) Vodacom will charge a high price; MTN will charge a low price. c) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a low price. d) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a high price. Vodacom +R500 MTN-R100 Vodacom+R100 MTN+R100 If it's expected that the incomes of people living in rural South Africa is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus?

Vodacom's Price Strategy High Price Low Price High Price Vodacom +R200 MTN+R200 Vodacom-R100 MTN +R500 Low Price a) Vodacom will charge a low price; MTN will charge a high price. b) Vodacom will charge a high price; MTN will charge a low price. c) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a low price. d) Both Vodacom and MTN will charge a high price. Vodacom +R500 MTN-R100 Vodacom+R100 MTN+R100 If it's expected that the incomes of people living in rural South Africa is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus?

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter15A: Auction Design And Information Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1.2CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please no written by hand solutions Suppose that the pricing strategies for FiberOne and of Starlink are shown in the table below. They have to decide whether to charge a high or low price for their internet service. The four pairs of payoff values show what each company expects to earn or lose in millions of dollars, depending on what the other company does. FiberOne’s Price Strategy Starlink’s Price Strategy High Price Low Price High Price Starlink+$200 FiberOne +$200 Starlink+$500 FiberOne - $100 Low Price Starlink-$100 FiberOne + 500 Starlink+$100 FiberOne +$100 If it’s expected that the incomes of people living in rural Nigeria is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus? a) a) Starlink will charge a low price; FiberOne will charge a high price. b) b) Starlink will charge a high price; FiberOne will charge a low price. c) c) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a low price. d) d) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a high price.
Suppose O2 and Vodafone are the only two telecommunicationscompanies in UK. Both companies are considering whether ornot to stop offering unlimited data plans. Each company has twostrategies: stop or don’t stop. The first entry in the brackets is the payoffsof O2 and the second entry is the payoffs of Vodafone, both in $million.What will be the dominant strategies of O2 and Vodafone and what willbe the Nash equilibrium? Explain your answers.
Analyze payoff matrix below. a-) Consider the grim trigger strategy for the game? Analyze the conditions for which this strategy constitutes an subgame perfect equiillbria. b-) Analyze the conditions for the tit for tat strategy to be equilibrium for the following histories: Histories that ends with (C,C) and (C,D) p1/p2 D 3.3 0.5 D 5,0 1,1
Suppose that GE is trying to prevent Maytag from entering the market for high efficiency clothes dryers. Even though high efficiency dryers are more costly to produce, they are also more profitable as they command sufficiently higher prices from consumers. The following payoffs table shows the annual profits for GE and Maytag for the advertising spending and entry decisions that they are facing. GE MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15 Based on this information, can GE successfully prevent Maytag from entering this market by increasing its advertising levels? What is the equilibrium outcome in this game? Suppose that an analyst at GE is convinced that just a little bit more advertising by GE, say another $2m, would be sufficient to deter enough customers from buying Maytag, thus, yield less than $0 profits for Maytag in the event it enters. Suppose that spending an extra $2m on advertising…
Asap
Company A and Company B are competing oligopolists. Both companies are considering increasing or maintaining their prices The payoff matrix shows the profits of the companies in millions based on their possible actions. Company B Increase Price Maintain Price Company A Increase Price $50, $40 $35, 530 Maintain Price 555, $45 $60, $35 The government offers a $5 milon subsidy to maintain current pricing. What is the expected outcome of the new payoff matrix, given the subsidy? The Nash equilibrium changes, and both companies will maintain their prices O The Nash equilbrium changes, and both companies will increase their prices O The Nash equilibrium remains the same, and both companies will increase their prices O Company A wit increase its price, whie Company B maintains its price. O Company A will maintain its price, while Company Bincreases ts price.
Suppose that the pricing strategies for FiberOne and of Starlink are shown in the table below. They have to decide whether to charge a high or low price for their internet service. The four pairs of payoff values show what each company expects to earn or lose in millions of dollars, depending on what the other company does.FiberOne’s Price StrategyStarlink’s Price StrategyHigh Price Low PriceHigh Price Starlink+$200 FiberOne +$200 Starlink+$500 FiberOne - $100Low Price Starlink-$100 FiberOne + 500 Starlink+$100 FiberOne +$100If it’s expected that the incomes of people living in rural Nigeria is expected to increase, what will the equilibrium outcome be, ceteris paribus?a) a) Starlink will charge a low price; FiberOne will charge a high price.b) b) Starlink will charge a high price; FiberOne will charge a low price.c) c) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a low price.d) d) Both Starlink and FiberOne will charge a high price.
10:04 PM cb = Chegg Economics Vo LTE expert.chegg.com/expertqna Time remaining: 00:09:49 Consider the following payoff matrix for two oligopolists that are deciding what quantity to produce: Firm 2 High Quantity Low Quantity $70k; $70k $130k; $20k High Quantity Firm 1 $20k; $130k $100k; $100k Low Quantity In the Nash equilibrium of this game, what are the payoffs to each firm? O a. Firm 1 receives $130k and Firm 2 receives $20k. O b. Firm 1 receives $20k and Firm 2 receives $130k. O c. Firm 1 receives $100k and Firm 2 receives $100k. O d. Firm 1 receives $70k and Firm 2 receives $70k. Answer Skip 4G Exit 2 ¹20%
There are two firms in the market (duopoly). These two firms are competingsimultaneously. The first firm chooses its output level (x) by predicting the second firm’soutput (y). Let c denote the total cost function c(x) = x and c(y) = y. Also, let’s assumethat the inverse demand function is p(Y) = 7 - Y where Y = x + y. (1) Obtain the reactionfunction of the first firm. (2) Find the equilibrium (output and profit of each firm) whentwo firms simultaneously compete
Problem 3. Consider the following game with three firms. First, firms 1 and 2 si- multancously choose quantities q1 and q2 respectively. After observing firm 1 and 2's quantities, firm 3 chooses its quantity q3. There is no production cost and the inverse demand function is p= 12 – (91 +2 + 93). (a) Compute the SPNE of this game. (b) Give an example of Nash equilibrium s* with s = 4 and s, = 6 , that is not subgame perfect. game theory question
You are playing a game with a friend. It’s yourmove but you don’t have a dominant strategy.Your payoff depends on what your friend doesafter your move. You consider flipping a coin todecide what to do. You are about to reach for acoin, but then you realize that your friend has adominant strategy. Explain how using backwardinduction (rather than a coin toss) will now determine your next move
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…