Of the four cells of the table, which gives the greatest combined benefits to Van and Carlos?When neither Van nor Carlos contributes to the public parkWhen Van contributes to the public park and Carlos doesn't, or vice versaWhen both Van and Carlos contribute to the public parkNow, consider the incentive facing Van individually. The following table looks similar to the previous one, but this time, it is partially completed withthe individual benefit data for Van. As shown previously, if both Van and Carlos contribute to a public good, Van receives a benefit of $640. On theother hand, if Carlos contributes to the public park and Van does not, Van receives a benefit of $720.Complete the right-hand column of the following table, which shows the individual benefits of Van.Hint: You are not required to consider the benefit of Carlos.CarlosContributeContribute$640,--Doesn't contribute$VanDoesn't contribute $720, --$If Carlos decides to contribute to the public park, Van would maximize his benefit by choosinghand, if Carlos decides not to contribute to the public park, Van would maximize his benefit by choosingto the public park. On the otherto the public park.These results illustrate

A free rider problem is a type of market failure, where individuals have an incentive to benefit…

Answered: Of the four cells of the table, which…

Principles of Microeconomics

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305156050

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter22: Frontiers Of Microeconomics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

Question

Of the four cells of the table, which gives the greatest combined benefits to Van and Carlos?
When neither Van nor Carlos contributes to the public park
When Van contributes to the public park and Carlos doesn't, or vice versa
When both Van and Carlos contribute to the public park
Now, consider the incentive facing Van individually. The following table looks similar to the previous one, but this time, it is partially completed with
the individual benefit data for Van. As shown previously, if both Van and Carlos contribute to a public good, Van receives a benefit of $640. On the
other hand, if Carlos contributes to the public park and Van does not, Van receives a benefit of $720.
Complete the right-hand column of the following table, which shows the individual benefits of Van.
Hint: You are not required to consider the benefit of Carlos.
Carlos
Contribute
Contribute
$640,--
Doesn't contribute
$
Van
Doesn't contribute $720, --
$
If Carlos decides to contribute to the public park, Van would maximize his benefit by choosing
hand, if Carlos decides not to contribute to the public park, Van would maximize his benefit by choosing
to the public park. On the other
to the public park.
These results illustrate

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Similar questions

Meghan and Jackson are both gardeners producing carrots and tomatoes. The table below compares their production possibilities schedules. Production Possibilities Schedules Meghan Carrots 10 5 0 Multiple Choice O Tomotoes 0 10 20 O If both producers decided to specialize and trade with each other, the terms of trade that would benefit both Meghan and Jackson (1 carrot = x tomatoes) would be between Carrots 24 12 0 1.25 and 2.5 tomatoes per carrot. 2 and 5 tomatoes per carrot. O2 2 and 2.5 tomatoes per carrot. Jackson 0.4 and 0.5 tomatoes per carrot. Tomatoes 0 30 60
Suppose the administration of a University that is located a high-crime urban area mustdecide on a policy to increase policing on its campus. The student population is 10,500 students but iscould increase if crime is reduced. The cost of added policing in terms of additional salary and equipmentis estimated to be $2.4 million per year. Suppose the administration plans to make their decision with thehelp of a benefit cost analysis of the policy. VSL is $11.8 million a. Explain how the concept of Value of a Statistical Life might factor into a benefit cost analysis of thispolicy. b. How many lives would need to be save to justify the added policing costs if only prevented deathswere considered as the policy benefit? c. Suppose it is believed that student enrollment will increase in the future if crime on campus is reduced.Write a formula to calculate the present value of benefits of policing if student enrollment increases by4% each year.
Consider a situation where two people are deciding (strategically) invest or not to investmoney in order to procure a public good. Each one has $500 that they can use for buyingpublic or private good. (Simply assume the additive utility form). Suppose the valuationfrom the public good is $1000 to each of them. (i) What happens when cost of procurementis $900? (ii) What happens if the procurement cost is $ 400.
Hubert and Manuel are considering contributing toward the creation of a water fountain. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the water fountain or to keep that $300 for a cell phone. Since a water fountain is a public good, both Hubert and Manuel will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.70 of benefit. For example, if both Hubert and Manuel choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the water fountain. So, Hubert and Manuel would each receive $420 of benefit from the water fountain, and their combined benefit would be $840. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a cell phone is a private good, if Hubert chooses to spend $300 on a cell phone, Hubert would get $300 of benefit from the cell phone and Manuel wouldn't receive any benefit from Hubert's choice. If Hubert still spends $300 on a cell phone and Manuel chooses to…
Ivar participates in a lot of Viking raids and needs to buy swords every month. He is offered a sword subscription. For a monthly fee he can buy as many swords as he wants at a per-sword price of $127. Swords can only be purchased in integer amounts. His Marginal Benefits (MB) from swords in a month is given in the table below. What is the maximum Ivar is willing to pay for this sword subscription. Quantity Marginal Benefit 1 $189 $146 $80 $76 $66 45
Four individuals who live around a camp are hosting separate chirstmas parties, and all are considering purchasing aerial fireworks; any fireworks purchased will be set off over the camp, and thus will be visible to everyone at all of the parties. Karl’s marginal benefit from having an additional package of fireworks (which includes the benefit to himself and all of his guests) is given by MBK = 300 – 5Q, Jessica is given by MBJ = 600 – 10Q, Lara’s is given by MBL = 900 – 15Q, and Emily’s is given by MBE = 1,200 – 20Q, where Q is the total number of packages of fireworks set off at all parties. Each package of fireworks costs $800 (i.e., MC = 800). How many packages of fireworks will actually be set off if it is left to the free market? How much deadweight loss will result if this activity is left to the free market (as in part b)?
In 2006, the Australian Government incorporated research into corporate social responsibilities to determineif there is a need to include social and environmental responsibilities within the Corporation Act throughamendment procedure. It was decided not to incorporate a particular regulation through legislation, insteadrely upon the 'market forces' to encourage companies to do the 'right thing'. This viewpoint was expressedthat if companies did not look after the environment or did not act in a socially responsible manner, peoplewould not want to consume the organisations' products. From the equity market perspective, potentialinvestors would not want to invest in the organisations, and further workers wouldn't want to work for them,and so forth. Because companies were aware of such market forces, they would do the 'right thing' even inthe absence of legislation.Requirement:1) Using theories such as Public Interest Theory, Capture Theory and Economic Interest Group Theoryto critically…
3. Voluntary contributions toward a public good Eleanor and Kyoko are considering contributing toward the creation of a public park. Each can choose whether to contribute $400 to the public park or to keep that $400 for a cell phone. Since a public park is a public good, both Eleanor and Kyoko will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.80 of benefit. For example, if both Eleanor and Kyoko choose to contribute, then a total of $800 would be contributed to the public park. So, Eleanor and Kyoko would each receive $640 of benefit from the public park, and their combined benefit would be $1,280. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a cell phone is a private good, if Eleanor chooses to spend $400 on a cell phone, Eleanor would get $400 of benefit from the cell phone and Kyoko wouldn't receive any benefit from Eleanor's choice. If Eleanor still spends $400 on…
3. Voluntary contributions toward a public good Kyoko and Rina are considering contributing toward the creation of a public park. Each can choose whether to contribute $300 to the public park or to keep that $300 for a weekend getaway. Since a public park is a public good, both Kyoko and Rina will benefit from any contributions made by the other person. Specifically, every dollar that either one of them contributes will bring each of them $0.90 of benefit. For example, if both Kyoko and Rina choose to contribute, then a total of $600 would be contributed to the public park. So, Kyoko and Rina would each receive $540 of benefit from the public park, and their combined benefit would be $1,080. This is shown in the upper left cell of the first table. Since a weekend getaway is a private good, if Kyoko chooses to spend $300 on a weekend getaway, Kyoko would get $300 of benefit from the weekend getaway and Rina wouldn't receive any benefit from Kyoko's choice. If Kyoko still spends $300 on…
Villagers each have $1,200 to invest in either cattle or a government bond. They will sell them at the end of the year. The bond earns 5% interest and the cattle price depends on the number of animals sold. Using the table below, the individual optimum is __________ cattle and the social optimum is _cattle. # Cattle 1 2 3 4 5 O 5; 1 4:3 1; 4 3; 2 Total Cattle Average income Income $1,400 $2,750 $4,050 $5,300 $5,850 Marginal Income
Your total benefits from spending time with your spouse are shown in the following table. Hours per Day Total Benefit 0 0 1 20 2 38 3 54 4 68 5 80 6 90 7 98 8 104 Alternatively, you have the option of working as many hours as you want, earning $11 per hour. Assume this is the next best use of your time. Use the marginal principle to find your optimal number of hours to spend with your spouse per day. The optimal amount of time for you to spend with your spouse is hours per day Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Suppose that a study of changes in admission prices reveals that when the price of admissionto the museum increases by 10%, adults reduce their ticket purchases by 10%, senior citizensreduce their ticket purchases by 20%, college students reduce their ticket purchases by 25%,and children reduce their ticket purchases by 30%. If the cost of having a person visit themuseum is the same regardless of whether the person is an adult, senior citizen, collegestudent, or child, which of the following pricing schemes is the most likely to be used by themuseum and why? Group of answer choices The museum will set one price of $12 for everyone because that is the most fair. $8 for children, $10 for college students, $12 for senior citizens, and $15 for adultsbecause the museum can earn higher profits by charging the lowest price to those with theleast elastic demand and the highest price to those with the most elastic demand. $15 for children, $12 for college students, $10 for senior citizens,…

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781305156050

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Principles of Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781305156050

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS